rdahl
com> cc:
Subject: RE: rc
chard A. Sitze
IBM WebSphere WebServices Development
Tom Jordahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09/30/2002 09:00 AM
Please respond to axis-dev
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:RE: rc2 status
I am in agr
+1 on your proposal, Tom.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Jordahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/30/2002 09:00:53 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:"'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:RE: rc2 status
I am in agreemen
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> com> cc:
>
>
>Subject: RE: rc2 status
&g
cc:
Subject: RE: rc2 status
09/30/2002 09:00
: Re: rc2 status
I would really like to stop this Friday, so I agree with Sam. If you
notice, I've been silent on a number of the votes because I don't think we
need them for 1.0. I haven't gone so far as to veto anything, but I've
also noticed that some things didn'
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: rc2 status
Richard Sitze wrote:
> +1 to releasing ALL changes todate.
The objective here is to slow down and eventually stop at some point. I
really would like to change the prevailing sentiment from "I see nothing
obvi
Thanks
j
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sitze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 1:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: rc2 status
+1 to releasing ALL changes todate. I've requested votes for a few, with
no -1 (but no real +1's either)... I
to axis-dev
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: rc2 status
Richard Sitze wrote:
> +1 to releasing ALL changes todate.
The objective here is to slow down and eventually stop at some point. I
really would like to change the prevailing sentime
Unfortunately, most of the recent ones have, IMHO, been in that category. :/
--G
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 5:27 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: rc2 status
>
>
> Richar
TECTED]
cc
bcc
Subject
Re: rc2 status
Richard Sitze wrote:
> +1 to releasing ALL changes todate.
The objective here is to slow down and eventually stop at some point. I
really would like to change the prevailing sentiment from "I see nothing
obviously wrong with that change so it should be
Richard Sitze wrote:
> +1 to releasing ALL changes todate.
The objective here is to slow down and eventually stop at some point. I
really would like to change the prevailing sentiment from "I see nothing
obviously wrong with that change so it should be included" to "I really
think that we w
ond to axis-dev
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: rc2 status
What happens next? Is rc2 it? Is there a potential for a rc3 next
week, or does this one smell like its the one?
The reason I am asking is I would like to write up some doc on how to
use th
27, 2002 4:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: rc2 status
>
>
> What happens next? Is rc2 it? Is there a potential for a rc3 next
> week, or does this one smell like its the one?
>
> The reason I am asking is I would like to write up some doc on how to
>
What happens next? Is rc2 it? Is there a potential for a rc3 next
week, or does this one smell like its the one?
The reason I am asking is I would like to write up some doc on how to
use the JMS transport and its sample. If I had that by COB Monday would
that still be possible to get in?
Dave
BMUScc:
Subject: Re: rc2 status
09/27/2002 0
While I don't like shipping a rc that does not pass our own tests, I will
do so this evening if there is no fix to the security problem. I'll
include any of the fixes which have been voted on at the time I cut the
release.
Meanwhile, I am on dalnet, but can't seem to get into undernet.
- Sa
17 matches
Mail list logo
