Re: WSDL Interop

2002-02-12 Thread Sam Ruby
Russell Butek wrote: > >> Example: define a subclass for each holder which is intended to be used for >> input only arguments. Or define static methods (e.g. getParameterMode >> analogous to the existing getParameterName) which can be used to determine >> the parameter mode. > > Ah! I understan

Re: WSDL Interop

2002-02-12 Thread Russell Butek
usly, yet. Russell Butek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sam Ruby/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS on 02/12/2002 03:13:55 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: WSDL Interop Russell Butek wrote: > > I can understand how deployment descriptors would work, but I don't

Re: WSDL Interop

2002-02-12 Thread Sam Ruby
Russell Butek wrote: > > I can understand how deployment descriptors would work, but I don't see how > reflection could solve our problem. Could you elaborate? Both would require invention and conventions. Example: define a subclass for each holder which is intended to be used for input only ar

Re: WSDL Interop

2002-02-12 Thread Russell Butek
bject: Re: WSDL Interop Russell Butek wrote: > > This is problemmatic. When Java2WSDL sees a holder, it has no way to > determine whether it's an inout parameter or simply an out parameter. It seems to me that there are two possible sources of information: reflection and the dep

Re: WSDL Interop

2002-02-12 Thread Sam Ruby
Russell Butek wrote: > > This is problemmatic. When Java2WSDL sees a holder, it has no way to > determine whether it's an inout parameter or simply an out parameter. It seems to me that there are two possible sources of information: reflection and the deployment descriptors. Do you have an opin

Re: WSDL Interop

2002-02-12 Thread Glyn Normington
Sam Ruby/Raleigh/I To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BM@IBMUS cc: Subject: WSDL In

RE: WSDL Interop

2002-02-10 Thread Glen Daniels
> First, I've noticed that with Simon's implementation of > Interop 2C tests, > the generated WSDL does not seem to contain any > entries. You > can see the results at > http://nagoya.apache.org:5049/axis/services/echo?wsdl . Right - the question is how do we generate these correctly? This

Re: WSDL Interop

2002-02-10 Thread Simon Fell
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002 14:30:35 -0500, in soap you wrote: >First, I've noticed that with Simon's implementation of Interop 2C tests, >the generated WSDL does not seem to contain any entries. You >can see the results at >http://nagoya.apache.org:5049/axis/services/echo?wsdl . I also noticed that f

WSDL Interop

2002-02-10 Thread Sam Ruby
First, I've noticed that with Simon's implementation of Interop 2C tests, the generated WSDL does not seem to contain any entries. You can see the results at http://nagoya.apache.org:5049/axis/services/echo?wsdl . Second, there is still much work to be done. Ideally, much of it should be done