Sanjiva,
We handle recieving SwA attachments. We don't have support for sending them.
-- dims
On 7/20/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 05:14 +0600, Thilina Gunarathne wrote:
Agreed. We need to do something to serialize the NON-MTOM attachments
in the
Couldn't we add a flag to MTOM attachments OMText which simply says
don't include the XOP. In other words, you create a standard MTOM
attachment but there is no reference in the XML.
Paul
On 7/20/06, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sanjiva,
We handle recieving SwA attachments. We
Hi Thilina,
On 7/19/06, Ben Malek, Hamid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I certainly will be happy to help you guys with this if you need to.
Thanks a lot. You are always welcome to join.
[Hamid]: Thilina, I know very well what the MTOM specification is saying,
and I agree with you that MTOM is
Let me explain why it is important to fully support SwA in
Axis2. As you know, ebMS is heavily built on SwA. The latest version of ebMS
(ebMS-3) is still relying on SwA (support for MTOM will only be in the second
part of the spec, but the B2B space will still be using SwA for many years
Hamid,
Looks like you have a good grasp on the details...Could you please
help us implement it? Let's start a JIRA and track progress.
thanks,
dims
On 7/19/06, Ben Malek, Hamid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me explain why it is important to fully support SwA in Axis2. As you
know, ebMS is
Hi,
Please see my reply to your earlier mail. Also some comments in line.
On 7/20/06, Ben Malek, Hamid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me explain why it is important to fully support SwA in Axis2. As you
know, ebMS is heavily built on SwA. The latest version of ebMS (ebMS-3) is
still relying on
Thank you Dims, Paul, and Thilina for
you kind replies.
I certainly will be happy to help you
guys with this if you need to. My contact info is at the end of this email. If
you want me to help you with this, use my personal contact info as I may not be
able to read all the emails from
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 05:14 +0600, Thilina Gunarathne wrote:
Agreed. We need to do something to serialize the NON-MTOM attachments
in the MsgContxt attachments object.
I thought we did this .. Dims, didn't u put some stuff to store an
unreferenced attachment in the MC??
Sanjiva.