Re: Re: Fear of Attachments

2003-03-03 Thread Steve Loughran
not tried that; that is what GET is for (i.e. I return URLs to retrieve stuff). Have a look at what the echo sample does - Original Message - From: "Mount, Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 10:22 Subject: RE: Re: Fear of A

RE: Re: Fear of Attachments

2003-03-03 Thread Mount, Dave
Steve, I also found your article very helpful. Do you know how to send attachments back to the client? This poses the same problem if you follow the 'echo' sample code. I've tried adding it the same way that JAFDataHandlerSerializer does. That is: Attachments attachments= context.getCurr

Re: Fear of Attachments

2003-02-03 Thread Steve Loughran
- Original Message - From: "Mark Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 14:32 Subject: Re: Fear of Attachments > Hi Steve, > > Thanks for the paper, it is helpful. I gather that it > makes sense to supp

Re: Fear of Attachments

2003-02-03 Thread Mark Mueller
Hi Steve, Thanks for the paper, it is helpful. I gather that it makes sense to support both MIME and DIME attachments in order to increase interoperability -- probably with two different operations in order to be able to specify the MIME-type of the MIME attachment in the WSDL binding. Your code

Fear of Attachments

2003-02-03 Thread Steve Loughran
For all those people who want to do attachments, here is an early draft of something I'm writing to look at attachments properly, including for .NET and other platforms. Here is the Axis coverage; the code was working against the CVS version of Axis this weekend; there have been changes in attachme