a Granny Smith, and each may be suited for
different types of recipes. :)
Regards,
Jonathan Anderson
Booz Allen Hamilton
-Original Message-
From: Shantanu Sen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 2:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Have doubts about Doc/
SOA Editor URL [Re: Have doubts about Doc/Lit with axis
hi,
there are some problems with URLs such as one provided in the press release:
http://www.capeclear.com/news/press_releases/reports/print/soaeditor_print.h
tm
as this http://www.capeclear.com/integration/soa/ does not seem work:
this URL
SOA Editor URL [Re: Have doubts about Doc/Lit with axis
hi,
there are some problems with URLs such as one provided in the press release:
http://www.capeclear.com/news/press_releases/reports/print/soaeditor_print.h
tm
as this http://www.capeclear.com/integration/soa/ does not seem work:
this URL
OTECTED]
Subject: Re: Have doubts about Doc/Lit with axis
Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
> For the most part, I concur with Jim. If you want to create an RMI-style
> programming interface, always use wrapped/literal. On the other hand, if
you
> want to send a predefined schema (such as a st
OTECTED]
Subject: Re: Have doubts about Doc/Lit with axis
Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
> For the most part, I concur with Jim. If you want to create an RMI-style
> programming interface, always use wrapped/literal. On the other hand, if
you
> want to send a predefined schema (such as a st
you can modify it to meet your needs? Just an idea. Good luck.
"David Thielen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
04/26/2004 09:09 AM
Please respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Subject
RE: Have doubts about Doc/Lit with axis
I tried and tried and tried to get do
Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
For the most part, I concur with Jim. If you want to create an RMI-style
programming interface, always use wrapped/literal. On the other hand, if you
want to send a predefined schema (such as a standard schema defined by your
favorite vertical industry group), you may need
-u options and he would have been a happy
> camper.
>
>
> Ross
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 10:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Have doubts about Doc/Lit with axis
>
Regards,
Anne
-Original Message-
From: Jim Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 9:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Have doubts about Doc/Lit with axis
Shantanu,
In doc/lit there is no spoon - er - I mean there is no noti
Regards,
Anne
-----Original Message-
From: Jim Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 9:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Have doubts about Doc/Lit with axis
Shantanu,
In doc/lit there is no spoon - er - I mean there is no notion of inout,
in,
Regards,
Anne
-----Original Message-
From: Jim Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 9:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Have doubts about Doc/Lit with axis
Shantanu,
In doc/lit there is no spoon - er - I mean there is no notion of inout,
in,
inal Message-
From: Shantanu Sen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 5:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Have doubts about Doc/Lit with axis
I think it will be a great help to all of us if you
could file a bug with your specific test-case.
I disagree with your statement t
hat has to be a
> known bug.
>
> - dave
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Shantanu Sen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 5:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Have doubts about Doc/Lit with axis
>
> I think it will be a great help
inar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 12:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Have doubts about Doc/Lit with axis
>
> David Thielen said:
> >>I tried and tried and tried to get doc/literal to
> work - and finally gave
> >>up. I thin
gt; Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 12:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Have doubts about Doc/Lit with axis
>
> David Thielen said:
> >>I tried and tried and tried to get doc/literal to
> work - and finally gave
> >>up. I think it just has too many problems
Have doubts about Doc/Lit with axis
David Thielen said:
>>I tried and tried and tried to get doc/literal to work - and finally gave
>>up. I think it just has too many problems still.
Joe Rattz said:
>Dave, I had a lot of problems too, specially with 1.2 beta, so I reverted
>back
I did...
http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1331
Nelson Minar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
04/26/2004 02:28 PM
Please respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
RE: Have doubts about Doc/Lit with axis
David Thielen said:
>>I tried and tried and trie
I think the key is you are using wrapped.
-Original Message-
From: Nelson Minar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 11:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Have doubts about Doc/Lit with axis
David Thielen said:
>>I tried and tried and tried to get doc/lite
David Thielen said:
>>I tried and tried and tried to get doc/literal to work - and finally gave
>>up. I think it just has too many problems still.
Joe Rattz said:
>Dave, I had a lot of problems too, specially with 1.2 beta, so I reverted
>back to 1.1. I know I have seen a lot that makes its supp
Thanks for the suggestion. I am done now, but I had a better tool anyway
... Anne Thomas Manes!
Dario Di Minno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
04/26/2004 10:23 AM
Please respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: Have doubts about Doc/Lit with axis
I had problems to
4/26/2004 09:09 AM
Please respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Subject
RE: Have doubts about Doc/Lit with axis
I tried and tried and tried to get doc/literal to work - and finally gave
up. I think it just has too many problems still.
- dave
-Original Me
You have not declared a namespace for your targetNamespace, so your
references to elements defined in your WSDL aren't valid.
Add the following namespace declaration to your element:
xmlns:abcde="abcde"
Anne
-Original Message-
From: cagerhon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, Ap
You have not declared a namespace for your targetNamespace, so your
references to elements defined in your WSDL aren't valid.
Add the following namespace declaration to your element:
xmlns:abcde="abcde"
Anne
-Original Message-
From: cagerhon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, Ap
espond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Subject
RE: Have doubts about Doc/Lit with axis
I tried and tried and tried to get doc/literal to work - and finally gave
up. I think it just has too many problems still.
- dave
-Original Message-
From: Jim Murphy [mailto:[
I tried and tried and tried to get doc/literal to work - and finally gave
up. I think it just has too many problems still.
- dave
-Original Message-
From: Jim Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 6:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Have doubts about Doc
Everything you have looks good to me - in terms of valid WSDL and
conforming SOAP request message. I wonder: what do you get when you
replay the "xsd:anyURI" type with xsd:string? I don't think it should
make a difference but...everything else looks so generic I'm at a loss
to suggest anything el
26 matches
Mail list logo
