RE: SOAPAction HTTP header required (again)

2002-11-27 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
Ken said: > I mapped the url-pattern 'services/*' to a very simple filter that > stuffs a SOAPAction > with an empty string value whenever one isn't sent by the caller. > You probably should stuff it with no value rather than an empty string. Per the spec (http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP/#_Toc478383528

RE: SOAPAction HTTP header required (again)

2002-11-27 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
re is nothing in the specification that requires a SOAP server to respond with a fault. Anne > -Original Message- > From: Chris Forbis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:47 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: SOAPAc

Re: SOAPAction HTTP header required (again)

2002-11-27 Thread Ken Pelletier
s 1.2, why not make it an option in the config? Require or not to require?) -Original Message- From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 6:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SOAPAction HTTP header required (again) In SOA

RE: SOAPAction HTTP header required (again)

2002-11-27 Thread Chris Forbis
] Subject: RE: SOAPAction HTTP header required (again) In SOAP 1.1, the SOAPAction header is required, although the contents can be empty. In SOAP 1.2, the SOAPAction header is optional. Anne > -Original Message- > From: Xander van der Merwe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent

RE: SOAPAction HTTP header required (again)

2002-11-26 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
IL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: SOAPAction HTTP header required (again) > > > Ok, according to SOAP1.1 it looks like it is required. It would > not be a bad > idea to put this into the Axis FAQ since it is one of the biggest gotchas > for any Axis newby. It took me a while anyway, to figu

Re: SOAPAction HTTP header required (again)

2002-11-26 Thread Ken Pelletier
The trouble is that we are often writing services to be vended to clients over which we have no control - and the client tool vendors don't seem to interpret it as being required. - Ken On Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 04:46 PM, Xander van der Merwe wrote: Ok, according to SOAP1.1 it looks l

Re: SOAPAction HTTP header required.

2002-11-26 Thread Ken Pelletier
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 5:19 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: SOAPAction HTTP header required. I have seen this before, I have wondered why an action is needed. I have MANY client tools that will not allow a action to be set, and for those I ha

Re: SOAPAction HTTP header required (again)

2002-11-26 Thread Xander van der Merwe
Ok, according to SOAP1.1 it looks like it is required. It would not be a bad idea to put this into the Axis FAQ since it is one of the biggest gotchas for any Axis newby. It took me a while anyway, to figure out how to get the MS Soap Client to work with Axis due to this requirement. Xander -

Re: SOAPAction HTTP header required.

2002-11-26 Thread Xander van der Merwe
I don't know of a way to avoid this, other than to change the Axis code to not throw an exception when the SOAPAction is empty. This might not be a bad idea as I believe the that the usage of the SOAPAction has not been formalized yet. On the client side (using the MS SOAP toolkit) I got around thi

RE: SOAPAction HTTP header required.

2002-11-26 Thread thomas . cherel
: Chris Forbis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 5:19 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: SOAPAction HTTP header required. I have seen this before, I have wondered why an action is needed. I have MANY client tools that will not allow a action to be set, and

RE: SOAPAction HTTP header required.

2002-11-26 Thread Chris Forbis
I have seen this before, I have wondered why an action is needed. I have MANY client tools that will not allow a action to be set, and for those I had to make a proxy to get the message, then convert it and resend with the action = "" set. Am I missing a simple way to turn off this need? -Or