Re: WS-I compliancy problem for generated wrapped WSDL

2005-01-23 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
> - Original Message - > From: Simon Fell > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; Eugene Shershnev > Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 5:01p > Subject: RE: WS-I compliancy problem for generated wrapped WSDL > > The first one is a false assertion from the WS-I tools, if you read the WS-

Re: WS-I compliancy problem for generated wrapped WSDL

2005-01-21 Thread Eugene Shershnev
e - From: Simon Fell To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; Eugene Shershnev Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 5:01p Subject: RE: WS-I compliancy problem for generated wrapped WSDL The first one is a false assertion from the WS-I tools, if you read the WS-I BP erata, you'l

RE: WS-I compliancy problem for generated wrapped WSDL

2005-01-20 Thread Simon Fell
The first one is a false assertion from the WS-I tools, if you read the WS-I BP erata, you'll see that it wasn't suposed to make inline schemas illegal. The second one is because you have an rpc/encoded service, which uses that arrayType, you'll need to change your service to be doc/literal