RE: java.util.Calendar - Why?

2003-05-31 Thread Mark Galbreath
I have no problem with the spec. But others seem to -Original Message- From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 1:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: java.util.Calendar - Why? Mark, Apache Axis implements JAX-RPC 1.0 Spec. We cannot release

RE: java.util.Calendar - Why?

2003-05-31 Thread ow
--- Jess Sightler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ahem... I would complain had they not chosen to use Calendar. > Calendar.getTime() makes conversion to a Date object easy, and Calendar > is much more powerful. Date doesn't support TimeZones very well at all. Why force people who do not need the p

RE: java.util.Calendar - Why?

2003-05-31 Thread Mark Galbreath
30, 2003 1:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: java.util.Calendar - Why? Mark Galbreath wrote: >Come on, guys! Why the issue - every constructor except the default is >deprecated; every method except toString() is deprecated. The JavaDoc >tells you to use Calendar instead.

RE: java.util.Calendar - Why?

2003-05-31 Thread Jess Sightler
On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 13:58, ow wrote: > --- Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Apache Axis implements JAX-RPC 1.0 Spec. We cannot release a version of Axis > > if we don't pass the > > TCK (http://www.jcp.org/en/resources/tdk) for JAX-RPC 1.0. The specification > > states that >

RE: java.util.Calendar - Why?

2003-05-31 Thread ow
--- Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Apache Axis implements JAX-RPC 1.0 Spec. We cannot release a version of Axis > if we don't pass the > TCK (http://www.jcp.org/en/resources/tdk) for JAX-RPC 1.0. The specification > states that > xsd:dataTime be mapped to java.util.Calendar. If y

Re: java.util.Calendar - Why?

2003-05-31 Thread ow
--- James Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > setTime() and getTime() are also not deprecated. It appears that all > this should be used for is for these two methods, other than that Date > is deprecated. If you look more carefully you'll discover other non-deprecated methods. Date is not depr

RE: java.util.Calendar - Why?

2003-05-31 Thread Davanum Srinivas
TECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 11:53 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: java.util.Calendar - Why? > > > http://java.sun.com/xml/downloads/jaxrpc.html#jaxrpcspec1 > > --- Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We do this because it i

Re: java.util.Calendar - Why?

2003-05-31 Thread James Black
Mark Galbreath wrote: Come on, guys! Why the issue - every constructor except the default is deprecated; every method except toString() is deprecated. The JavaDoc tells you to use Calendar instead. Are you that obtuse? setTime() and getTime() are also not deprecated. It appears that all this

RE: java.util.Calendar - Why?

2003-05-31 Thread Mark Galbreath
30, 2003 10:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: java.util.Calendar - Why? Looking at the 1.4.1_02 doc, Date is not deprecated. It does have a deprecated constructor and some deprecated methods, but the class itself is not deprecated. -Original Message- From: Mark Galbreath [mailto

RE: java.util.Calendar - Why?

2003-05-31 Thread Mark Galbreath
bullshit -Original Message- From: ow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 10:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: java.util.Calendar - Why? --- Mark Galbreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No. java.util.Date has been deprecated since JDK 1.1 - take a look

RE: java.util.Calendar - Why?

2003-05-31 Thread Mark Galbreath
yeah, right. You have one constructor and 2 methods. Real useful, dude. -Original Message- From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 11:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: java.util.Calendar - Why? http://java.sun.com/xml/downloads/jaxrpc.html

RE: java.util.Calendar - Why?

2003-05-31 Thread Davanum Srinivas
http://java.sun.com/xml/downloads/jaxrpc.html#jaxrpcspec1 --- Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We do this because it is specified in the JAX-RPC 1.0 spec (See section 4.2.1) > > Thanks, > dims > > --- ow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Mark Galbreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

RE: java.util.Calendar - Why?

2003-05-31 Thread Davanum Srinivas
We do this because it is specified in the JAX-RPC 1.0 spec (See section 4.2.1) Thanks, dims --- ow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Mark Galbreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No. java.util.Date has been deprecated since JDK 1.1 - take a look at the > > API. > > > > Mark > > That is certainl

RE: java.util.Calendar - Why?

2003-05-31 Thread ow
--- Mark Galbreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No. java.util.Date has been deprecated since JDK 1.1 - take a look at the > API. > > Mark That is certainly not true. Contrary to some people's beliefs, java.util.Date is alive and well in the latest JDK ;-) _

RE: java.util.Calendar - Why?

2003-05-31 Thread Rudolph, Troy
] Subject: RE: java.util.Calendar - Why? No. java.util.Date has been deprecated since JDK 1.1 - take a look at the API. Mark -Original Message- From: ow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 10:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: java.util.Calendar - Why? Hi, Based on the

RE: java.util.Calendar - Why?

2003-05-31 Thread Mark Galbreath
No. java.util.Date has been deprecated since JDK 1.1 - take a look at the API. Mark -Original Message- From: ow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 10:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: java.util.Calendar - Why? Hi, Based on the documentation, it appears that xsd:d