)
From: Praveen Peddi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 5:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: array of recursive beans (doc/literal style)
I don't really like the option 1. And I don't know how to go for option 2
:). I
Thanks
Praveen
- Original Message -
From:
Dino
Chiesa
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 11:59
AM
Subject: RE: array of recursive beans
(doc/literal style)
Is this a v1.2 RC thing, or are you using AXIS v1.1?
And, how are
you
"/
/sequence /complexType
Not sure if this is valid though, it's just my
guess.
Eugene
- Original Message -
From:
Praveen
Peddi
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005
12:39p
Subject: Re: array of recursive beans
(doc/literal style)
Thanks for the
nillable="true"
type="xsd:string"//sequence/complexType
I made my .NET client point to the
modified WSDL. I still get the same error. My .NET client cant serialize the
beans after top level.
I didn't change the java code on server
side though. All I did was changed WSDL manu
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 5:06
PM
Subject: RE: array of recursive beans
(doc/literal style)
yes, our most recent messages crossed in the
ether.
From: Praveen Peddi
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005
2:34 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED
rsion is faster and better
looking. ;)
"WSDL first,a good idea. (tm)"
From: Praveen Peddi
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005
5:43 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: array of
recursive beans (doc/literal style)
I don't really like the option 1. And I do
's
no difference. Except the .NET version is faster and better looking.
;)
"WSDL first,a good idea. (tm)"
From: Praveen
Peddi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 5:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: array of recursive beans (d
