-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
The input callback implementation of XML::LibXML and XML::LibXSLT has
changed in the respective CVS versions. The attached patch against
current AxKit SVN will help to get AxKit work again with the CVS version
of both LibX* modules. The release 1.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Re-cross-posting, maybe this time someone will answer...
Steffen Schwigon wrote:
| Effort should go into getting more feedback for your work. For me it
| seems a simple "OK, go for it" from the core developers with cvs
| commit rights and a branch fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steffen Schwigon wrote:
| Effort should go into getting more feedback for your work. For me it
| seems a simple "OK, go for it" from the core developers with cvs
| commit rights and a branch for your work would be the most valuable
| thing at this mom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kip Hampton wrote:
| Speaking personally for a moment, the timing for this couldn't
| possibly be worse. On the one hand, I'm very excited to be at the end
| of the
| publishing process for the O'Reilly AxKit book, but, in emerging from
| that 2-year o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Sergeant wrote:
| In
| theory that should cause all the Apache::Test tests to be skipped
| according to the way I hacked Makefile.PL.
In practice it does it, too :-)
michael
- --
IT ServicesUniversity of Innsbruck
063A F25E B064 A98
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
patch attached
- --
IT ServicesUniversity of Innsbruck
063A F25E B064 A98F A479 1690 78CD D023 5E2A 6688
http://zis.uibk.ac.at/.m/uibk.ac.at_pgp_pubkey.asc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
iD8DBQE/JWuueM3QI1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
after running make test over a fresh cvs checkout i found the following
in the error_log
[EMAIL PROTECTED] xml-axkit]# less t/logs/error_log
Syntax error on line 13 of /usr/local/build/xml-axkit/t/conf/extra.conf:
AxKit object version 1.61 does not
Hi Matt,
After sending two patches for AxKit::XSP::WebUtils on 16 Oct 2001
against 1.3_90 and on 15 Jun 2002 against 1.4 without getting any
feedback I thought why not continue the tradition of my annual attempts...
Attached, the diff against the current CVS version adding missing docs
and addi