Re: PMC membership

2003-01-28 Thread Barrie Slaymaker
t if no one else did. > > This means: Kip, if you have fun doing that, I'm all for it. > > I'm going to jump on that as concensus then, just cos it's easier that way > ;-) > > OK, so committers please vote for PMC membership now for: > > [+1] Matt Sergeant &g

Re: PMC membership

2003-01-28 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Monday, Jan 27, 2003, at 14:17 Europe/London, Matt Sergeant wrote: OK, so committers please vote for PMC membership now for: For completion's sake: [ ] Kip Hampton +1

Re: PMC membership

2003-01-27 Thread Kip Hampton
Matt Sergeant wrote: OK, so committers please vote for PMC membership now for: I'm not sure how appropriate it is to vote for one's self, but, in the interest of completeness... [ ] Matt Sergeant +1 [ ] Kip Hampton +1 -kip

AW: AW: PMC membership

2003-01-27 Thread Murat Ünalan
> > > [ ] Matt Sergeant > > +1 > > > [ ] Kip Hampton > > +1 > > I should have been more clear. This is for committers only. > Not just general members of the list. > > Thanks. > > -- > Ok, then store my votes for "Who are THE perl xml dudes of the year" ;) Murat

Re: PMC membership

2003-01-27 Thread Robin Berjon
Matt Sergeant wrote: OK, so committers please vote for PMC membership now for: [ ] Matt Sergeant +1 [ ] Kip Hampton +1 (NB: in ASF style doesn't it take three +1 and no -1 to ratify the vote?)

Re: AW: PMC membership

2003-01-27 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Murat Ünalan wrote: > > OK, so committers please vote for PMC membership now for: > > > > [ ] Matt Sergeant > +1 > > [ ] Kip Hampton > +1 I should have been more clear. This is for committers only. Not just general members of the list. Thanks.

AW: PMC membership

2003-01-27 Thread Murat Ünalan
> OK, so committers please vote for PMC membership now for: > > [ ] Matt Sergeant +1 > [ ] Kip Hampton +1 > > Reply in the ASF standard +1 manner for each please. Thanks. > > -- > Murat

Re: PMC membership

2003-01-27 Thread Jörg Walter
> did. This means: Kip, if you have fun doing that, I'm all for it. > > I'm going to jump on that as concensus then, just cos it's easier that way > ;-) > > OK, so committers please vote for PMC membership now for: > > [ ] Matt Sergeant +1 > [ ] Ki

Re: PMC membership

2003-01-27 Thread Matt Sergeant
hat as concensus then, just cos it's easier that way ;-) OK, so committers please vote for PMC membership now for: [ ] Matt Sergeant [ ] Kip Hampton Reply in the ASF standard +1 manner for each please. Thanks. -- <:->get a SMart net Spam trap - do not mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: PMC membership

2003-01-27 Thread Jörg Walter
On Sunday, 26. January 2003 18:32, Kip Hampton wrote: > I'd be happy to help out. I know Jörg is interested, as well, so, > please, let's hear from everyone before we jump into any kind of voting. Here's a definite "Yes" for Matt. As for me volunteering, it's just that. So if anyone else has fun h

Re: PMC membership

2003-01-26 Thread Kip Hampton
I'd be happy to help out. I know Jörg is interested, as well, so, please, let's hear from everyone before we jump into any kind of voting. -kip . Matt Sergeant wrote: Guys, I know you're not generally responsive to axkit-dev posts, but this is pretty important as it has a cut-off date (31st Jan)

PMC membership

2003-01-26 Thread Matt Sergeant
Guys, I know you're not generally responsive to axkit-dev posts, but this is pretty important as it has a cut-off date (31st Jan). We need to nominate 1 or 2 persons to become a member of the XML PMC at apache. What this means is someone who is willing to attend (via phone) regular board meetin