On Wednesday, 24. September 2003 20:18, Kip Hampton wrote:
> On the one hand, I think users would greatly benefit from having things
> like document('xmldb://whatever/query') "just work" from within XSLT and
> XPathScript stylesheets, but I can't help thinking that we'd be opening
> a real can of w
After careful thought, I'm still of two minds about the advisability of
doing URI-scheme bindings inside AxKit.
On the one hand, I think users would greatly benefit from having things
like document('xmldb://whatever/query') "just work" from within XSLT and
XPathScript stylesheets, but I can't h
On Friday, 19. September 2003 21:38, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On 19 Sep 2003, at 10:52, Jörg Walter wrote:
> > I can easily back out the change in XPathScript, as it is the only
> > module not
> > working. The others work well even on several of my large sites using
> > all
> > sorts of file://, sql:
On Friday, 19. September 2003 16:31, Kip Hampton wrote:
> > I can easily back out the change in XPathScript, as it is the only module
> > not working. The others work well even on several of my large sites using
> > all sorts of file://, sql://, document_root relative and axkit:// URIs
> > from wi
On 19 Sep 2003, at 10:52, Jörg Walter wrote:
I can easily back out the change in XPathScript, as it is the only
module not
working. The others work well even on several of my large sites using
all
sorts of file://, sql://, document_root relative and axkit:// URIs from
within XSLT, XSP and XInclud
On 19 Sep 2003, at 10:52, Jörg Walter wrote:
Finally, is this list archived somewhere? I have been thrown off due
to my
mail disaster a few weeks ago and would like to catch up with mails.
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/SummarizeList?listId=50
I'll update the mailinglists.xml file to reflect t
Jörg Walter wrote:
On Friday, 19. September 2003 09:57, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Since it broke the test suite, can you back out the change and check it
in on a branch. Thanks.
I can easily back out the change in XPathScript, as it is the only module not
working. The others work well even on several
On Friday, 19. September 2003 09:57, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On 17 Sep 2003, at 22:56, Jörg Walter wrote:
> > I have just commited a pseudo-protocol registry which should ease the
> > implementation of new pseudo-protocols similar to "axkit:". It
> > replaces th
On 17 Sep 2003, at 22:56, Jörg Walter wrote:
I have just commited a pseudo-protocol registry which should ease the
implementation of new pseudo-protocols similar to "axkit:". It
replaces these
specific hacks with one generic solution. Behaviour should not change
in any
circumst
Hi!
I have just commited a pseudo-protocol registry which should ease the
implementation of new pseudo-protocols similar to "axkit:". It replaces these
specific hacks with one generic solution. Behaviour should not change in any
circumstance.
Two providers that use this feature are
10 matches
Mail list logo
