Hi AxDevers...
After being submerged in my new contractor's office, which was getting hacked
by some annoying trojan right away and cleaning stuff up, I'll finally give
my 2 cents to this issue.
On Friday, 11. April 2003 13:24, Chris Leishman wrote:
> >> It is a smidge hacky I agree. I did it
On Monday, April 14, 2003, at 10:09 AM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Sun, 13 Apr 2003, Chris Leishman wrote:
Actually - the Cocoon guys have covered this topic in their basic
concepts introduction:
http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/userdocs/concepts/index.html#c2-
abstractions
Their conclusion is pretty much
On Sun, 13 Apr 2003, Chris Leishman wrote:
> Actually - the Cocoon guys have covered this topic in their basic
> concepts introduction:
>
> http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/userdocs/concepts/index.html#c2-
> abstractions
>
> Their conclusion is pretty much the same as mine - starting with XSP in
> the
On Friday, April 11, 2003, at 02:53 PM, Chris Leishman wrote:
I guess my way of doing it would be XML -> XSLT (which creates XHTML
but also includes XSP tags) -> XSP -> XHTML.
That way the XSLT is still responsible for creating the XHTML and then
the XSP just adds in the dynamic elements. Bu
On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Chris Leishman wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 9, 2003, at 03:24 PM, Kip Hampton wrote:
>
> > Okay, I finally had a chance to install the proposed caching patches
> > that came from Chris L through the users' list (CC'ing you, Chris since
> > I'm not sure if you're subbed here o
On Friday, April 11, 2003, at 02:42 PM, Robin Berjon wrote:
There's nothing "wrong" with your approach, but you are using XSP to
produce XHTML, and the latter /may/ contain styling information.
Producing styled output from XSP is imho a bad idea which is why, in
the process you describe, starti
Chris Leishman wrote:
On Friday, April 11, 2003, at 01:42 PM, Kip Hampton wrote:
It does change it, though. Your patched version always returns a DOM
instance, the current version serializes the result to a string using
the XSLT processor's output_string( $result ) if the current process
is $las
Kip Hampton wrote:
Here's what I suggest:
1) Accept the patches.
2) Re-implement the current all-or-nothing" caching behavior of the
current Cache.pm using the new interfaces and keep this behavior as the
default.
3) Ship Cache::Incremental (or whatever) as a standard alternative.
Reasonable? Do
On Friday, April 11, 2003, at 02:24 PM, Robin Berjon wrote:
That one is dead, but I thought we had carried the subscriber base
over. I guess perhaps not and you missed the switch message.
I probably signed up after the switch message since I just got the
address of the axkit.org website. I've u
On Friday, April 11, 2003, at 01:42 PM, Kip Hampton wrote:
The content-length was different because the content returned was
different. See below.
Ok...
It does change it, though. Your patched version always returns a DOM
instance, the current version serializes the result to a string using
th
On Wednesday, April 9, 2003, at 03:24 PM, Kip Hampton wrote:
Some things to note and random ideas:
* There's small increase in requests per second with caching turned
off, but a modest loss with caching turned on.
This agrees with my assessment. Of course you should also test with
dynamic objec
Chris Leishman wrote:
On Wednesday, April 9, 2003, at 03:24 PM, Kip Hampton wrote:
Okay, I finally had a chance to install the proposed caching patches
that came from Chris L through the users' list (CC'ing you, Chris since
I'm not sure if you're subbed here or not).
I though I was subscribed - but
Chris Leishman wrote:
Really? I didn't notice that... AFAIK a Content-Length header is only
actually returned when delivering from a cache file (apache calculates
the content-length, etc, after the $r->filename is set and the handler
declines). When delivering normally I noticed that there is
On Wednesday, April 9, 2003, at 03:24 PM, Kip Hampton wrote:
Okay, I finally had a chance to install the proposed caching patches
that came from Chris L through the users' list (CC'ing you, Chris since
I'm not sure if you're subbed here or not).
I though I was subscribed - but it turns out there a
14 matches
Mail list logo
