If you mean if there's something like XMLSpy on Win32 I'm afraid there
nothing like this. There are various free XML-Editors out there most of
them written in Java. Still you could run e.g. XMLSpy using wine, I've
already tried it and it works perfect.
As XSL/XML-Editor I'm using Netbeans IDE whic
> Great I always have my own configuration stuff at the end of
> the httpd.conf
> inlcuded using Include conf/axkit.conf, ... .
yep, I will seperate it out - the only reason it was in the httpd.conf file was cos it
wasn't working so I was trying to reduce the number of things that could've gone
Great I always have my own configuration stuff at the end of the httpd.conf
inlcuded using Include conf/axkit.conf, ... .
I don't know what you want to do?
How much do you know about XML, XSL, XSLT and Perl?
E.g. take a look at exslt.org (http://www.exslt.org/) which defines
extension functions,
> I have the PerlModule AxKit line as the very first line in
> the httpd.conf (well, not including comments). I suspected
> the module wasn't loading but I couldn't figure out why. I
> still don't but at least I know how to check if it is!
>
> Peter.
He shoots ... he SCORES!!!
Celeb
> Hi Peter,
>
> No there's one big difference:
>
> Mine:
> --8<--
> Apache/1.3.28 (Unix) AxKit/1.62 mod_perl/1.28 configured
> --8<--
>
> Yours:
> --8<--
> Apache/1.3.29 (Unix) mod_perl/1.29 configure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| When you say it doesn't look good - are you referring to the error_log
entry?
| It's exactly the same as yours
It's not.
His:
Apache/1.3.28 (Unix) AxKit/1.62 mod_perl/1.28
Yours:
Apache/1.3.29 (Unix) mod_perl/1.29
Note the m
Hi Peter,
No there's one big difference:
Mine:
--8<--
Apache/1.3.28 (Unix) AxKit/1.62 mod_perl/1.28 configured
--8<--
Yours:
--8<--
Apache/1.3.29 (Unix) mod_perl/1.29 configured
--8<--
> On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 14:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > error_log
> > [Mon Feb 9 13:09:06 2004] [notice] Apache/1.3.29 (Unix)
> mod_perl/1.29 configured -- resuming normal operations
> > [Mon Feb 9 13:09:06 2004] [notice] suEXEC mechanism
> enabled (wrapper: /usr/local/apache/bin/suexec)
>
On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 14:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> error_log
> [Mon Feb 9 13:09:06 2004] [notice] Apache/1.3.29 (Unix) mod_perl/1.29 configured --
> resuming normal operations
> [Mon Feb 9 13:09:06 2004] [notice] suEXEC mechanism enabled (wrapper:
> /usr/local/apache/bin/suexec)
> [Mon Feb
> To
> avoid this, I use the AddHandler directive instead:
>
> AddHandler axkit .xml .xsp .dkb .rdf
> or you could add an xml-stylesheet processing instruction to
> the top of
> your XML document (after the XML declaration and before the top-level
> element).
>
>
>
> but, really using
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# Added to include AxKit directives - PRE 06/02/2004
PerlModule AxKit
#SetHandler perl-script
#PerlHandler AxKit
#AddHandler axkit .xml .xsp .dkb
# Install AxKit main parts
SetHandler AxKit
# Setup style type mappings
AxAddStyleMap text/xsl Apache::AxKit::Language::LibXSLT
> Many thanks for all your help today and the others who
> replied to my earlier queries. If I get stuck with the
> config next week, I'll be sure to let you know ... :)
It appears I may have been a little premature ... *sigh*
I think I must be doing something silly. I've added the following
> Apache::Test can not be installed/run as root hence you can
> not install
> it via CPAN-Shell, see mod_perl-Archives about that.
> -8<-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Makefile.PL
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] nobody
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] test
> [EMAIL PROTEC
Apache::Test can not be installed/run as root hence you can not install
it via CPAN-Shell, see mod_perl-Archives about that.
-8<-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Makefile.PL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] nobody
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECT
> Hi Peter,
>
> You don't really need Sablotron if you are using XML::LibXSLT as
> TransformerLib which most of the people on this list do.
>
> So need to install.
>
> Tom
Hey, Tom,
I am so close I can taste it!
Well, I figured out, before I received your helpful replies, that there was clea
Ahah!
With some more poking around I discovered the problem was that I was missing some of
the gcc packages - specifically the ones required for g++. Nothing to do with expat
after all! The configure script output was just a plain lie!
So now I'm over that, I'm getting a very specific error -
Hi Peter,
You don't really need Sablotron if you are using XML::LibXSLT as
TransformerLib which most of the people on this list do.
So need to install.
Tom
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e
Thanks, Tom,
I figured it was failing one of the tests but wasn't sure if I could safely ignore it
or not. I patched it and it worked fine - XML::LibXSLT is now installed, according to
the CPAN shell.
I moved onto installing Sablot (used latest version 1.0.1 instead of 0.98 mentioned on
the s
Hi,
tests not passed by XML::LibXSLT there's a bug in the test-suite. I think.
Tom
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feel free to send me the output of "perl Makefile.PL DEBUG=1".
Tom
Hi, Tom,
I'd experimented setting the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable already with those values and it didn't appear to make much difference.
Attached below is the output with DEBUG=1 (never run th
1. LD_LIBRARY_PATH:
===
--8<--
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
--8<--
2. Makefile-Arguments:
==
--8<--
perl Makefile.PL
Hi,
There's a bug in the testsuite I think.
Tom
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
tests not passed by XML::LibXSLT there's a bug in the test-suite. I think.
Tom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
t/10functionsok 6/14Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
t/10functions.t line 9.
t/10functionsok 7/14Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or s
You can apply this patch to t/10functions.t:
-8<-
cd XML-LibXSLT/t
patch 10functions.t 10functions.t.patch
-8<-
-8<-
31c31
<
---
>
33c33
<
---
>
-
> There's the problem you don't have zlib installed !
> Install the
> devel-package and try again. The error-messag procuded by perl
> Makefile.PL is misleading because the include/lib-paths are set
> appropiately.
Ga!!
Why didn't it just say that?!?! ... OK, installed that an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feel free to send me the output of "perl Makefile.PL DEBUG=1".
Tom
Hi, Tom,
I'd experimented setting the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable already with those values and it didn't appear to make much difference.
Attached below is the output with DEBUG=1 (never run th
> Feel free to send me the output of "perl Makefile.PL DEBUG=1".
>
> Tom
Hi, Tom,
I'd experimented setting the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable already with those
values and it didn't appear to make much difference.
Attached below is the output with DEBUG=1 (never run that before) - I'm no
1. LD_LIBRARY_PATH:
===
--8<--
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
--8<--
2. Makefile-Arguments:
==
--8<--
perl Makefile.PL
> -Original Message-
> From: Kermit Tensmeyer
> Sent: 23 January 2004 4:31 AM
> (hmm) I'm reinstalling with suse 9.0 at this point, but for
> the last 5 SuSE
> releases, I've found better results, by -not- using the RPM's
> (well I allow
> the RPM's to be installed to mungle the depend
apxs, the .h files, and in Apache 2.x the APR libraries.
Bet you can do it in under 2 hours.
On Friday 23 January 2004 9:54 pm, Kermit Tensmeyer wrote:
> - Original Message -
> ]From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ]To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ]Sent: F
- Original Message -
]From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
]To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
]Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 6:20 AM
]Subject: RE: Axkit Installation on default SUSE 9.0 installation
]Ahh.
]I had a feeling that might be the case. It's the rec
> Dunno about SuSE or RH RPMS, but Mandrake's situation seems
> MUCH better, or at
> least they have lucked out... If CPAN doesn't work from your
> RPM installed
> perl, then the RPMs are kaka, pure and simple! Perl has to be
> pretty darn
> broken before CPAN stops working.
>
> There are a
pdating an RPM built perl with CPAN
> modules. Your mileage will vary...
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 8:47 AM
> Subject: Axkit Installation on default SUSE 9.0 installa
Message-
> From: Kermit Tensmeyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 January 2004 4:31 AM
> To: Edwards,PR,Peter,XJG4 R; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Axkit Installation on default SUSE 9.0 installation
>
>
> (hmm) I'm reinstalling with suse 9.0 at this point, bu
PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 8:47 AM
Subject: Axkit Installation on default SUSE 9.0 installation
Hi,
Is there anyone who's managed to achieve the above and could give me a few
pointers?
I've been reading webpages and the mail archives f
Hi,
Is there anyone who's managed to achieve the above and could give me a few pointers?
I've been reading webpages and the mail archives for the past three days and just
don't seem to be making any progress. If I could get this working, I think I'd be
happy to reinstall it and write up the so
36 matches
Mail list logo
