Re: Mixing different XSP Taglibs

2002-02-01 Thread Jörg Walter
On Friday 01 February 2002 00:49, you wrote: I think part of the problem here might be that you're trying to make TaglibHelper fit your preconceptions, rather than working within its own worldview in the more complex cases. In this particular case, the original poster wants to have the

Re: Mixing different XSP Taglibs

2002-02-01 Thread Jörg Walter
On Friday 01 February 2002 00:20, you wrote: After looking at some other taglibs source code it seems to me that the XSP module itself could probably be enhanced via a few OO perl tricks so that you could just subclass it to create a taglib in a fairly clean way. In essence what it seems

Re: Mixing different XSP Taglibs

2002-02-01 Thread Tod Harter
On Thursday 31 January 2002 18:49, you wrote: From: Tod Harter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cool. We did find a few ways around some of the limitations in TaglibHelper as well, but your right, in general it is only good for fairly simple cases, more complex taglibs need something like what

Re: Mixing different XSP Taglibs

2002-02-01 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Tod Harter wrote: See perldoc Apache::AxKit::Language::XSP. That's (almost) exactly how raw taglibs work, except they're dispatched to different modules/packages by namespace. For an example check out the ESQL taglib. Honestly I'd just looked at the source of a few

Re: Mixing different XSP Taglibs

2002-02-01 Thread Tod Harter
On Friday 01 February 2002 11:10, Matt Sergeant wrote: On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Tod Harter wrote: See perldoc Apache::AxKit::Language::XSP. That's (almost) exactly how raw taglibs work, except they're dispatched to different modules/packages by namespace. For an example check out the ESQL

Re: Mixing different XSP Taglibs

2002-02-01 Thread Tod Harter
On Friday 01 February 2002 12:28, Steve Willer wrote: On Fri, 2002-02-01 at 10:36, Tod Harter wrote: I can tell you exactly why things need to be ordered that way. It might not seem right on the surface of it, but the problem is that its expensive with some protocols to establish the

Re: Mixing different XSP Taglibs

2002-01-31 Thread Steve Willer
From: Tod Harter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cool. We did find a few ways around some of the limitations in TaglibHelper as well, but your right, in general it is only good for fairly simple cases, more complex taglibs need something like what you're describing (which seems fairly close to the raw

Re: Mixing different XSP Taglibs

2002-01-31 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Tod Harter wrote: Cool. We did find a few ways around some of the limitations in TaglibHelper as well, but your right, in general it is only good for fairly simple cases, more complex taglibs need something like what you're describing (which seems fairly close to the raw

Re: Mixing different XSP Taglibs

2002-01-30 Thread Robin Berjon
On Wednesday 30 January 2002 20:41, Marc-Olivier Bernard wrote: Sorry for my quite basic question, This list is for all questions :) I wanted to try to mix util and param taglibs like that : util:include-filexsp:attribute name=nameparam:num/.xml/xsp:attribute/util:include-file (i get

Re: Mixing different XSP Taglibs

2002-01-30 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Marc-Olivier Bernard wrote: Hi there, Sorry for my quite basic question, I wanted to try to mix util and param taglibs like that : util:include-filexsp:attribute name=nameparam:num/.xml/xsp:attribute/util:include-file (i get them work separatly), But the code

Re: Mixing different XSP Taglibs

2002-01-30 Thread Tod Harter
On Wednesday 30 January 2002 12:28, you wrote: On Wednesday 30 January 2002 20:41, Marc-Olivier Bernard wrote: Sorry for my quite basic question, This list is for all questions :) I wanted to try to mix util and param taglibs like that : util:include-filexsp:attribute