Thanks to everyone who responded to my site list question. We are porting to AxKit :)
so expect some more addings to AxKit site list.
Pavel
On Thursday 31 January 2002 14:18, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Pavel Penchev wrote:
> > I like AxKit a lot and I want to implement it as a
> > basis of the development in my company. I'll do it
> > anyway but could you send me a list of sites that are
> > using AxKit - I hope this
On Friday 01 February 2002 14:39, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Tod Harter wrote:
> > Its only a myth until you run benchmarks on real-world applications. As
> > the guy said, its not an end-all and be-all of databases by any means. On
> > the other hand its generally a LOT faster tha
After returning to the axkit mailing list and seeing 10 more
posts titled "Site List", I'm over here sweating bricks thinking
"Oh God, more formatting"
sitelist.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
---
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Tod Harter wrote:
> Its only a myth until you run benchmarks on real-world applications. As the
> guy said, its not an end-all and be-all of databases by any means. On the
> other hand its generally a LOT faster than serializing stuff to cache it, and
> simple enough to run th
> The other reason why we cache like crazy is simple - MySQL's query queue
> optimizer sucks shit.
>
Ah yes... You can tweak things some to give the queue optimizer hints about
what to give priority to, but I can see where you'd be in rough shape with
that sort of surge load on complex queries.
>
> Its only a myth until you run benchmarks on real-world
> applications.
Some quick stats of one of our pages on our production box.
total script time for 51195 page views 47576.5304 seconds.
of which 37251.9272 is waiting for sql server. Thats 78% of the time.
That's including a lot of cachi
On Friday 01 February 2002 12:17, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On 1 Feb 2002, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> > Tod Harter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I'd be pretty surprised if this caching scheme is faster than
> > > running queries into MySQL, that sucker is BRUTALLY fast! If you
> > > build derived
> I'd be pretty surprised if this caching scheme is faster than
> running queries
> into MySQL, that sucker is BRUTALLY fast! If you build
> derived tables and use
> those as caches (so you just basically are doing "SELECT *
> FROM table") it
> will almost certainly exceed the speed at which you c
Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you mean besides the fact that "10 to 50 times faster than postgres" is
> a myth? ;-)
Weren't we talking earlier today about how the speed of a certain
other piece of software is very closely related to what you actually
do with it? ;-)
-Dom
--
On 1 Feb 2002, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> Tod Harter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'd be pretty surprised if this caching scheme is faster than
> > running queries into MySQL, that sucker is BRUTALLY fast! If you
> > build derived tables and use those as caches (so you just basically
> > are
Tod Harter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd be pretty surprised if this caching scheme is faster than
> running queries into MySQL, that sucker is BRUTALLY fast! If you
> build derived tables and use those as caches (so you just basically
> are doing "SELECT * FROM table") it will almost certain
I'd be pretty surprised if this caching scheme is faster than running queries
into MySQL, that sucker is BRUTALLY fast! If you build derived tables and use
those as caches (so you just basically are doing "SELECT * FROM table") it
will almost certainly exceed the speed at which you can deserial
>
> "Mike Chamberlain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > We use a multiple stage pipeline to simplify the WML creation
> > at various stages. We don't use the internal AxKit cache
> > system, due to us providing customised pages based on postcodes
> > (that's 1.7 million variations of each page). We
"Mike Chamberlain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We use a multiple stage pipeline to simplify the WML creation
> at various stages. We don't use the internal AxKit cache
> system, due to us providing customised pages based on postcodes
> (that's 1.7 million variations of each page). We do however
On Thursday 31 January 2002 21:05, Pavel Penchev wrote:
> I like AxKit a lot and I want to implement it as a
> basis of the development in my company. I'll do it
> anyway but could you send me a list of sites that are
> using AxKit - I hope this will make a difference when
> I go to my boss :)
Mo
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Terrence Brannon wrote:
>
> On Friday, February 1, 2002, at 05:35 AM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> > Would anyone care to start gathering these together into a
> > live_sites.xml
> > file so we can publish them on the site?
>
>
> gain experience with AxKit
> I will do it
On Friday, February 1, 2002, at 05:35 AM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Would anyone care to start gathering these together into a
> live_sites.xml
> file so we can publish them on the site?
gain experience with AxKit
I will do it
I will type the XPS for my new tags
too
>
> On Fri
e various AxKit support channels.
Mike Chamberlain.
Senior Systems Engineer.
Upmystreet.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Pavel Penchev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 31 January 2002 20:05
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Site list
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I lik
Would anyone care to start gathering these together into a live_sites.xml
file so we can publish them on the site?
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Richard Padley wrote:
> At Semantico we implemented the Grove's dictionaries of Art and Music
> using a mixture of Axkit and Mason coding.
>
> http://www.grovear
At Semantico we implemented the Grove's dictionaries of Art and Music
using a mixture of Axkit and Mason coding.
http://www.groveart.com/
http://www.grovemusic.com/
These are huge (24 and 28 print volumes) resources, and we used Axkit to
transform the xml using mostly xpathscript stylesheets.
>It looks great. I tried to get an English version but couldn't.
>How do I do this?
By clicking on "English" button in russian version or by requesting URL
http://teleguide.sovintel.ru/eng
It has to work. I've tried it successfully today.
>
>On Friday, February 1, 2002, at 03:20 AM, Oleg Assov
It looks great. I tried to get an English version but couldn't.
How do I do this?
On Friday, February 1, 2002, at 03:20 AM, Oleg Assovski wrote:
> Hi!
> You hit my heart with your question!
> Yeasterday, after 2 weeks of increadible overkill we finished
> main work and met the deadline.
Hi!
You hit my heart with your question!
Yeasterday, after 2 weeks of increadible overkill we finished main work and met the
deadline.
Our site is build around AxKit, using Perl, XSLT, and Sessions. It supports multiple
browsers and interface languages.
You can take a look at it at http:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Pavel Penchev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I like AxKit a lot and I want to implement it as a
> basis of the development in my company. I'll do it
> anyway but could you send me a list of sites that are
> using AxKit - I hope this will make a difference when
> I go to my boss :)
Actuall
Hi,
I like AxKit a lot and I want to implement it as a
basis of the development in my company. I'll do it
anyway but could you send me a list of sites that are
using AxKit - I hope this will make a difference when
I go to my boss :)
All the best,
Pavel
26 matches
Mail list logo
