Re: [Ayatana] Left close buttons on tabs

2011-02-01 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Sladen wrote on 27/01/11 12:24: On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: Chromium and Chrome have close buttons on the right of their tabs because it's faster to use than having them on the left.

Re: [Ayatana] Left close buttons on tabs

2011-02-01 Thread Vishnoo
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 11:51 +, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Sladen wrote on 27/01/11 12:24: On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: Chromium and Chrome have close buttons on the right of their tabs because it's faster to

Re: [Ayatana] Left close buttons on tabs

2011-02-01 Thread Remco
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:51, Matthew Paul Thomas m...@canonical.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Sladen wrote on 27/01/11 12:24: On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: Chromium and Chrome have close buttons on the right of their tabs because it's

Re: [Ayatana] Left close buttons on tabs

2011-02-01 Thread frederik.nn...@gmail.com
in other words, we close windows more often than we identify them by their title-bar-text, since most windows we close are in the front, top-of-z-stack, and we already know what we're about to close. so all we care about is finally hittilng that button via Fitt's worst law. aim, shoot. No read.

[Ayatana] Implementation of a built-in screencaster in Unity like there is in GNOME Shell

2011-02-01 Thread ks64
Despite all the hype about Unity, there is one thing that is making me miss GNOME Shell: built-in screencasting. Press Ctrl+Shift+Alt+R and you can start and stop screencast recording in GNOME Shell. If a similar feature existed in Unity, it could be an excellent advertising tool: Users could

[Ayatana] [Bug 711396] [NEW] segfault in nux::IOpenGLFrameBufferObject::Deactivate

2011-02-01 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
ks64 (mango-k) has assigned this bug to you for xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu Natty: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel After the latest X/driver updates compiz runs but if you enable the unityshell plugin you get a crash in nux while it tries to setup FBOs. It looks like nux is

[Ayatana] [Bug 711396] Re: segfault in nux::IOpenGLFrameBufferObject::Deactivate

2011-02-01 Thread ks64
Anyway, I assigned this bug to the Ayatana discussion team, since it's Unity related. Hopefully this bug will get fixed very soon. I have decided to install Unity 2D as a workaround for now. ** Changed in: nux (Ubuntu Natty) Assignee: (unassigned) = Ayatana Discussion (ayatana) ** Changed

[Ayatana] [Bug 711396] Re: segfault in nux::IOpenGLFrameBufferObject::Deactivate

2011-02-01 Thread David Callé
There is a workaround in bug description #711401 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/711401 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ayatana Discussion, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711396 Title: segfault in

Re: [Ayatana] Implementation of a built-in screencaster in Unity like there is in GNOME Shell

2011-02-01 Thread Ward Muylaert
Eh, that doesn't sound like it has anything to do with GNOME Shell or Unity, but more like simply running a screencasting program in the background that triggers on that particular key combo. Ward Muylaert ward.muyla...@gmail.com 3de Bachelor Wiskunde - Minor Computer Wetenschappen Vrije

[Ayatana] [Bug 711396] Re: segfault in nux::IOpenGLFrameBufferObject::Deactivate

2011-02-01 Thread Ingo Gerth
** Changed in: unity Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ayatana Discussion, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711396 Title: segfault in nux::IOpenGLFrameBufferObject::Deactivate Status in Unity: Confirmed

[Ayatana] [Bug 711396] Re: segfault in nux::IOpenGLFrameBufferObject::Deactivate

2011-02-01 Thread ks64
** Changed in: nux (Ubuntu Natty) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu Natty) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ayatana Discussion, which is a bug assignee.

[Ayatana] [Bug 711396] Re: segfault in nux::IOpenGLFrameBufferObject::Deactivate

2011-02-01 Thread Bryce Harrington
Comment #5 suggests this bug is caused by the recent sync of glew from debian. Fwiw, probably not a bug in xserver-xorg-video-intel, since yesterday's update was just a no-change rebuild; the last actual change was last Thursday. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Ayatana] [Bug 711396] Re: segfault in nux::IOpenGLFrameBufferObject::Deactivate

2011-02-01 Thread Connor Carney
I have the same crash with xserver-xorg-video-ati, so it seems not to be an intel-specific issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ayatana Discussion, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711396 Title: segfault in

[Ayatana] [Bug 711396] Re: segfault in nux::IOpenGLFrameBufferObject::Deactivate

2011-02-01 Thread Bryce Harrington
Thanks Connor, that confirms what I suspected. ** Package changed: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu Natty) = glew (Ubuntu Natty) ** Changed in: glew (Ubuntu Natty) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ayatana Discussion, which

[Ayatana] [Bug 711396] Re: segfault in nux::IOpenGLFrameBufferObject::Deactivate

2011-02-01 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/glew -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ayatana Discussion, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711396 Title: segfault in nux::IOpenGLFrameBufferObject::Deactivate Status in Unity: Confirmed Status in “glew”

[Ayatana] [Bug 711396] Re: segfault in nux::IOpenGLFrameBufferObject::Deactivate

2011-02-01 Thread Ken VanDine
** Changed in: nux (Ubuntu Natty) Assignee: Ayatana Discussion (ayatana) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ayatana Discussion, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711396 Title: segfault in

[Ayatana] [Bug 711396] Re: segfault in nux::IOpenGLFrameBufferObject::Deactivate

2011-02-01 Thread ks64
Sorry; had no idea that the bug Mods unassigned this bug. ** Changed in: glew (Ubuntu Natty) Assignee: Ayatana Discussion (ayatana) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ayatana Discussion, which is a bug assignee.

Re: [Ayatana-commits] [Merge] lp:~ted/indicator-datetime/no-error-with-no-proxy into lp:indicator-datetime

2011-02-01 Thread Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
Review: Approve review approve Please grep for more g_error()s :-) -- https://code.launchpad.net/~ted/indicator-datetime/no-error-with-no-proxy/+merge/48109 Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch lp:indicator-datetime. ___ Mailing list:

Re: [Ayatana-commits] [Merge] lp:~ted/indicator-datetime/no-crash-geoclue into lp:indicator-datetime

2011-02-01 Thread Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
Review: Approve It's unclear to me exactly what situation these checks guard against. Can you add a code comment explaining the situation before you merge this? -- https://code.launchpad.net/~ted/indicator-datetime/no-crash-geoclue/+merge/48105 Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch

Re: [Ayatana-commits] [Merge] lp:~mterry/dbusmenu/fix-props-return into lp:dbusmenu

2011-02-01 Thread Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
Review: Approve review approve good catch! -- https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/dbusmenu/fix-props-return/+merge/48026 Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed to branch lp:dbusmenu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-commits Post to

[Ayatana-commits] [Branch ~indicator-applet-developers/indicator-me/trunk] Rev 128: version bump for 0.2.13

2011-02-01 Thread noreply
revno: 128 tags: 0.2.13 committer: Ken VanDine ken.vand...@canonical.com branch nick: indicator-me timestamp: Tue 2011-02-01 09:07:02 -0500 message: version bump for 0.2.13 modified: configure.ac -- lp:indicator-me

[Ayatana-commits] [Branch ~indicator-applet-developers/indicator-me/trunk] Rev 129: post release version bump 0.2.14

2011-02-01 Thread noreply
revno: 129 committer: Ken VanDine ken.vand...@canonical.com branch nick: indicator-me timestamp: Tue 2011-02-01 09:14:10 -0500 message: post release version bump 0.2.14 modified: configure.ac -- lp:indicator-me

[Ayatana-commits] [Merge] lp:~ted/indicator-datetime/no-crash-geoclue into lp:indicator-datetime

2011-02-01 Thread noreply
The proposal to merge lp:~ted/indicator-datetime/no-crash-geoclue into lp:indicator-datetime has been updated. Status: Needs review = Merged For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~ted/indicator-datetime/no-crash-geoclue/+merge/48105 --

[Ayatana-commits] [Merge] lp:~ted/libindicate/dbus-name-owner into lp:libindicate

2011-02-01 Thread Ted Gould
Ted Gould has proposed merging lp:~ted/libindicate/dbus-name-owner into lp:libindicate. Requested reviews: Indicator Applet Developers (indicator-applet-developers) For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~ted/libindicate/dbus-name-owner/+merge/48260 --

Re: [Ayatana-commits] [Merge] lp:~ted/libindicate/dbus-name-owner into lp:libindicate

2011-02-01 Thread Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
Review: Needs Fixing review needsfixing No need to subscribe to NameOwnerChanged. You can simplify the code and save the bus daemon the burden of an extra match rule by just connecting to the notify::g-name-owner signal on your proxy. --