On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 08:44 -0500, Ted Gould wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 11:15 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
There is no need for a Preferences for the Messaging Menu, and this
use case does not justify the creation of one.
We have specified a preference dialog for the messaging menu.
Scott Kitterman wrote:
And also best that these apps not require configuration prior to gaining
access to the preference (e.g. the Evolution example given earlier).
Requiring users to set up applications in order to not be bothered by them
in the menu is not a usability win.
+1 and
David Barth wrote:
Ted Gould wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 20:07 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Aha! And this is the nature of the bug as I see it. I do not HAVE a
message of any kind, but I still have the e-mail icon. Please switch to
some other icon when
On Aug 25, 2009, at 8:44AM , Ted Gould wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 11:15 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
There is no need for a Preferences for the Messaging Menu, and this
use case does not justify the creation of one.
We have specified a preference dialog for the messaging menu. The
On Aug 25, 2009, at 8:44AM , Ted Gould wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 11:15 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
There is no need for a Preferences for the Messaging Menu, and this
use case does not justify the creation of one.
We have specified a preference dialog for the messaging menu. The
On Aug 25, 2009, at 9:14AM , Rick Spencer wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 09:06 -0500, David Siegel wrote:
For a concrete example, consider Evolution. To remove the Evolution
launcher from the messaging menu, you'd have to launch Evolution and
set up your email account before you can access
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 11:15 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
There is no need for a Preferences for the Messaging Menu, and this
use case does not justify the creation of one. The messaging menu
should be removed ONLY if there are NO applications configured to
present themselves in there when
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 07:14:45AM -0700, Rick Spencer wrote:
Assuming that users prefer to act directly on objects, would it not be
more direct to allow them to right click on the menu item to remove it?
This would be consistent with how users remove the Evo launcher from the
panel.
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 09:20 -0500, David Siegel wrote:
On Aug 25, 2009, at 9:14AM , Rick Spencer wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 09:06 -0500, David Siegel wrote:
For a concrete example, consider Evolution. To remove the Evolution
launcher from the messaging menu, you'd have to launch
On Aug 25, 2009, at 9:29AM , Rick Spencer wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 09:20 -0500, David Siegel wrote:
On Aug 25, 2009, at 9:14AM , Rick Spencer wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 09:06 -0500, David Siegel wrote:
For a concrete example, consider Evolution. To remove the Evolution
launcher
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 10:38 -0500, David Siegel wrote:
True, but personally, I'd rather make the system work the way users
want
and expect it to, even if it requires deviating from the HIG.
Cheers, Rick
If I'd asked my customers what they wanted, they'd have said a faster
horse.
This did not come off in the good natured way that I intended.
(stupid email and it's lack of body language and voice).
I seriously meant to convey that I defer to the design team's judgment
on this topic.
Cheers, Rick
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 08:44 -0700, Rick Spencer wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-25
Context menus on menus themselves is something generally avoided. I'm
pretty sure it's a big no-no in the GNOME HIG as well, but I'd have to
check.
David
On the topic of the HIG, please do not call this preferences if it is
to control a single thing. There is no practical reason to give
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 21:51 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
We won't ever ask anyone to right click on a menu. Ever.
Verb menu or noun menu? It might be worth sorting out the two.
Martin,
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to
14 matches
Mail list logo
