Hi Cheri,
Most likely, they did baptize him, but the priest lost the record (or
something), and when they had to find it again, it was nowhere to be found.
It's easy to solve that by re-baptizing him.
João Ventura
http://tombp.pt/en
On Monday, 21 July 2014 06:57:18 UTC+2, Cheri Mello wrote:
Hi,
What’s the link?
Diane
From: azores@googlegroups.com [mailto:azores@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Eddie Machado
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2014 8:03 AM
To: azores@googlegroups.com
Subject: [AZORES-Genealogy] Translation help, mom's name
Hi all, I once again need a little help
You think I would remember the most important part
http://culturacores.azores.gov.pt/biblioteca_digital/SJR-VL-NORTEGRANDE-B-1825-1839/SJR-VL-NORTEGRANDE-B-1825-1839_item1/P265.html
Thanks
On Sunday, July 20, 2014 11:54:53 AM UTC-4, DiG wrote:
Hi,
What’s the link?
Diane
Hi Eddie,
I'm kind of new at this too but I think you have done pretty well. I think
the mother's name is Britta (maybe Ritta) Victorina. On paternal Grandmother
it looks like there is a de jesus after Maria Isabel. The date is the birth
date and I think it's 8-15-1819 (?) maybe
Eddie M,
I think mom is Ritta Victorina (modern: Rita Vitorina).
I swear I'm reading born 15 Aug 1819. The book is for 1825-1839. Someone
else better take a look. They could have baptized the child much later. It
happens on occasion. I can't quite get the baptism date because of the
word
Cheri,
I agree with you,born on the 15 Aug 1819, baptized on the 17 Aug 1819, but
the preceding page is 1827 which is between 1825-1839. Who knows what the
priest was thinking.
Tish
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Cheri Mello gfsche...@gmail.com wrote:
Eddie M,
I think mom is Ritta
That is what threw me off. I was actually searching after 1831. Right now I
am on page 127 in 1825-1839 and it is 1831.
Thank you all for your help!
On Sunday, July 20, 2014 1:37:55 PM UTC-4, sfig wrote:
Cheri,
I agree with you,born on the 15 Aug 1819, baptized on the 17 Aug 1819,
but
Well, if others are also seeing 1819, then maybe it was a small child being
baptized a few years later. Maybe there was an outbreak of something and
they didn't take the baby in after birth so they wouldn't infect everyone
there (if they knew about such things then). Maybe they were in the
Dan,
Yes, they were. It appears that they discovered he wasn't baptized when he
went to get married. All of his siblings were baptized except him. Don't
know if the family all got sick, everyone was busy harvesting or what. No
exact date was given, only the year. So he was baptized as an
9 matches
Mail list logo