So now it looks like Living DNA did away with the indemnify clause and now
it's more of a use at your own risk. Roberta Estes wrote about the update
today: https://goo.gl/RTzvke
Cheri Mello
Listowner, Azores-Gen
Researching: São Miguel island: Vila Franca, Ponta Garca, Ribeira Quente,
Ribeira das
Good to know. Thanks!
On Jun 15, 2017 7:16 AM, "'Lisa' via Azores Genealogy" <
azores@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> I purchased one of their kits (for myself) at Jamboree. I read the
> article yesterday and it does raise concerns. However, I only want to test
> with them for clues on my U.K.
I purchased one of their kits (for myself) at Jamboree. I read the article
yesterday and it does raise concerns. However, I only want to test with them
for clues on my U.K. origins which go back to 1700's. I don't plan to download
data (I can do that from FTDNA). My takeaway from the
I wouldn't want to pay for the court costs of a company. I'm sure Judy
Russell, The Legal Genealogist, will say more when she gets back from her
genealogy speeches in New Zealand or Australia.
Cheri Mello
Listowner, Azores-Gen
Researching: São Miguel island: Vila Franca, Ponta Garca, Ribeira
Cheri,
I disagree with the tone of this article. Living DNA is providing its users
with a deterrent because I find most of us are oblivious of future consequences
and merrily go about sharing our DNA key foolishly.
The question it raises for me is this. Would I give any stranger the key to
I think I would avoid this company like the plague.
Rick
From: azores@googlegroups.com [mailto:azores@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Cheri Mello
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 7:22 PM
To: Azores Genealogy; madeira-geneal...@googlegroups.com;
islandrou...@googlegroups.com
Subject:
6 matches
Mail list logo
