Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] two-way-tunnel quirks

2007-12-01 Thread Axel Neumann
Hi, perhaps this has something to do with the reduced maximum-transfer-unit (mtu) which ist left for the tunnel interfaces. Since the one-way-tunnel do only tunnel the upling-traffic but NOT tunnel the downlink traffic this is not a problem when trying to connect to a intractable www server. D

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batmand in debian

2007-12-01 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Marek, On Saturday 01 December 2007 18:39, Marek Lindner wrote: > great news ! Thanks to all people involved in that process. :-) Wesley did a lot :-) > > Which means, we can now prepare 0.3 for Debian/experimental, or to > > unstable if you you think that's better. > I think unstable would

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] rv791 <---> rv824 incompatible?

2007-12-01 Thread Marek Lindner
> The rv791 routes fine, but gateway make some Problems. So we included > this testet version and only request the users that _want_ to use > batman-gateway-tunnel tu update their batmand. (updatecheck is > includet) -> now our Plans are broken... :-( Sorry about that. We don't do it to explicit

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] rv791 <---> rv824 incompatible?

2007-12-01 Thread tetzlav
Marek Lindner schrieb: >>> [ 7946500] Is an internet gateway (class 1) >>> [ 7946510] Drop packet: incompatible batman version (105) >>> > > In revision 812 the header format was changed due to future compability > issues > (the version field is now the first field in the header). > I'

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] rv791 <---> rv824 incompatible?

2007-12-01 Thread Marek Lindner
> > [ 7946500] Is an internet gateway (class 1) > > [ 7946510] Drop packet: incompatible batman version (105) In revision 812 the header format was changed due to future compability issues (the version field is now the first field in the header). I'm sorry about the inconvenience - it wont

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batmand in debian

2007-12-01 Thread Marek Lindner
Hi, > batmand is now in Debian/unstable, see > http://packages.qa.debian.org/batmand great news ! Thanks to all people involved in that process. :-) > Which means, we can now prepare 0.3 for Debian/experimental, or to unstable > if you you think that's better. I think unstable would be fine

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] two-way-tunnel quirks

2007-12-01 Thread Marek Lindner
> now i found an issue which i didn't relate with batman > first. I got several reports of users, hotmail/msn/live.com > not being accessible anymore... > Yesterday i found out theres also problems with some pop server > not beeing accessible, but everything works fine directly at the > upstream g

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] batmand in debian

2007-12-01 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, batmand is now in Debian/unstable, see http://packages.qa.debian.org/batmand :-) Which means, we can now prepare 0.3 for Debian/experimental, or to unstable if you you think that's better. regards, Holger pgpCbKuUFsSZZ.pgp Description: PGP signature

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] rv791 <---> rv824 incompatible?

2007-12-01 Thread tetzlav
> r...@17-21:~# batmand > -v > > > B.A.T.M.A.N. 0.3-beta rv791 (compatibility version 4) > r...@17-21:~# batmand -cd4 > [ 33051930] Received BATMAN

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] two-way-tunnel quirks

2007-12-01 Thread Jan Hetges
Hi all as i'm running bmxd-rv804 only ;-) for almost two weeks now, almost without problems... now i found an issue which i didn't relate with batman first. I got several reports of users, hotmail/msn/live.com not being accessible anymore... Yesterday i found out theres also problems with some pop