Hi,
> with or without leading "./" - its always the same _relative_ path, i
> think...
I agree.
> The files are on the box, but the manager thinks "not fully installed"
Why do you think so ?
> and an "ipkg files batman-adv" leads to zero output.
As far as I remember, the ipkg command is pr
Bastian Bittorf schrieb:
The data.tar.gz in the archive is
not build correct. All file-paths must
be relative, not absolute:
./usr/sbin/batmand-adv (at the moment)
usr/sbin/batmand-adv (correct)
with or without leading "./" - its always the same _relative_ path, i
think...
r...@tetzlav-upli
The data.tar.gz in the archive is
not build correct. All file-paths must
be relative, not absolute:
./usr/sbin/batmand-adv (at the moment)
usr/sbin/batmand-adv (correct)
At the first look that doesn't seem to be
a problem, but the packet-manager does
not accept that. The files are on the box,
but
Hello Bastian,
the output comes from ether_ntoa(), but i personally like the padded
output more, too. ;)
So the latest revision should print pretty MACs. :)
best regards,
Simon
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 03:00:58PM +, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> during batch/debug-mode the output of all
>
