Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] Sync hash implementation of batgat and batman-adv

On Friday, 26. September 2008 03:15:08 Sven Eckelmann wrote: > The compare functions had a different interpretation of its return value > and kmalloc can sleep inside batgat because we are running in user context > of kernel. All your patches look very good - thanks (again) for your support. As fa

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] My patches don't reference you mails

On Friday, 26. September 2008 21:06:16 Sven Eckelmann wrote: > > Perhaps the mailing list has a problem with multi-part email. Have you > > tried to send new emails without attachments/pgp? > > If it is working than the mailing ist has a problem with that and > > attachments should be avoided. > >

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] My patches don't reference you mails

On Friday 26 September 2008 14:56:17 Stephan Enderlein (Freifunk Dresden) wrote: > > https://list.open-mesh.net/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n/2008-September.txt.gz > > If I look at this file I agree with you that there is no In-Replay-To. > But the email header is normaly much longer. So we can see this

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] My patches don't reference you mails

Hi, > https://list.open-mesh.net/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n/2008-September.txt.gz If I look at this file I agree with you that there is no In-Replay-To. But the email header is normaly much longer. So we can see this if you create a new message for the list (not a reply). The mailing list modifies th

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] My patches don't reference you mails

On Friday 26 September 2008 13:39:30 Sven Eckelmann wrote: > On Friday 26 September 2008 13:19:19 Stephan Enderlein (Freifunk Dresden) > > [...] > > When I display the complete email header of you emails I have the > > following line: > > "In-Reply-To: <6fd627b9bdd448cd88026446baddb8a5.squir...@wm.

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] Send TUNNEL_IP_REQUEST as response of TUNNEL_IP_REQUEST

On Friday 26 September 2008 13:19:19 Stephan Enderlein (Freifunk Dresden) wrote: > [...] > When I display the complete email header of you emails I have the following > line: > "In-Reply-To: <6fd627b9bdd448cd88026446baddb8a5.squir...@wm.ddmesh.de>" > For some reason you are creating emails with th

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] Send TUNNEL_IP_REQUEST as response of TUNNEL_IP_REQUEST

Hi, > Sry, I haven't replied to any threads with my [PATCH] mails. Please check > your > mua and the mail headers of my [PATCH] mails. You will notice that there > are > no In-Reply-To or References in them - just the usual stuff mutt creates > for > "new" mails and the stuff mailman adds. When I