2012-07-17 kl. 21:29 skrev Mitar:
Hi!
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Andrew Lunn and...@lunn.ch wrote:
You have to be careful with packet reordering.
Hm. True. Yes, maybe multipath routing is just in theory a good idea.
;-) I also don't really believe in it. Or even believe it is
This regression was introduced in 724d05c8215e4e8186097121595ef20b6ba601b7
Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann s...@narfation.org
---
translation-table.c |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/translation-table.c b/translation-table.c
index 172d50b..37ae4a9 100644
---
Hi!
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Christian Huldt christ...@solvare.se wrote:
So you might be able to build virtual a community network on top of the
internet?
Not might, but we are already doing that. :-)
The only problem is that current wireless routing protocols are not
really
On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 20:06:27 Mitar wrote:
I was more curious about the bandwidth routing than the latency stuff.
The current routing algorithm already takes latency into account. An
alternate path always need to be better than the current path. If both
paths are equal the faster
Hi!
I had a chat the other day on IRC about how to assign ip addresses
whether there is an internet gateway available or not.
Here is the problem and the solution I came up with. Let me know if
that makes sense or if I'm complicating my life.
* Problem *
Our network is still small, there
Have you tried to set every node with static ip but also providing dhcp
server to a range of ips ?
For example: node 1 from 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.1.10 then node 2:
192.168.1.11 to 192.168.1.20 and so on.
On 07/18/2012 09:18 PM, Geneviève Bastien wrote:
Hi!
I had a chat the other day on IRC
Another stab at this, which solves a slightly different scenario:
https://bitbucket.org/guidoi/batmesh/raw/ee7042b01ebe/packages/batman-adv-auto-gw-mode/files/etc/hotplug.d/net/99-batman-gw
This makes no assumptions about the interface (static or dhcp), but
instead asks for a lease in an alias
