commit d2b6cc8e460494251442a877fcbc150faa175b4f upstream.
skb_linearize(skb) possibly rearranges the skb internal data and then changes
the skb-data pointer value. For this reason any other pointer in the code that
was assigned skb-data before invoking skb_linearise(skb) must be re-assigned.
In
commit d2b6cc8e460494251442a877fcbc150faa175b4f upstream.
skb_linearize(skb) possibly rearranges the skb internal data and then changes
the skb-data pointer value. For this reason any other pointer in the code that
was assigned skb-data before invoking skb_linearise(skb) must be re-assigned.
In
From: Antonio Quartulli or...@autistici.org
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:20:30 +0200
commit d2b6cc8e460494251442a877fcbc150faa175b4f upstream.
That commit does not exist in Linus's tree.
It exists in the net-next tree.
You must only make stable submissions for patches that have
made their way
On Tuesday 19 June 2012 00:41:40 David Miller wrote:
[]
You must only make stable submissions for patches that have
made their way into Linus's tree.
That is correct. These patches were meant to be sent as reply to the patch you
pulled today (that contained the initial Cc: stable@...).
From: Sven Eckelmann s...@narfation.org
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:07:12 +0200
On Tuesday 19 June 2012 00:41:40 David Miller wrote:
[]
You must only make stable submissions for patches that have
made their way into Linus's tree.
That is correct. These patches were meant to be sent as
On Tuesday 19 June 2012 02:02:27 David Miller wrote:
[]
Patches you want to end up in -stable should be submitted for 'net'
not 'net-next'.
There is no other valid submission scheme.
I know that. This is also completely right and not contested by me. I did not
submit/create the pull
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 11:51 +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
On Tuesday 19 June 2012 02:02:27 David Miller wrote:
[]
Patches you want to end up in -stable should be submitted for 'net'
not 'net-next'.
There is no other valid submission scheme.
I know that. This is also completely
On Thursday 14 June 2012 22:21:28 Antonio Quartulli wrote:
skb_linearize(skb) possibly rearranges the skb internal data and then
changes the skb-data pointer value. For this reason any other pointer in
the code that was assigned skb-data before invoking skb_linearise(skb)
must be re-assigned.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 01:45:11PM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
On Thursday 14 June 2012 22:21:28 Antonio Quartulli wrote:
skb_linearize(skb) possibly rearranges the skb internal data and then
changes the skb-data pointer value. For this reason any other pointer in
the code that was
On Friday, June 15, 2012 04:21:28 Antonio Quartulli wrote:
skb_linearize(skb) possibly rearranges the skb internal data and then
changes the skb-data pointer value. For this reason any other pointer in
the code that was assigned skb-data before invoking skb_linearise(skb)
must be re-assigned.
10 matches
Mail list logo