Hi,
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 07:48:23PM +0800, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:56:25AM +0100, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> > It is therefore currently unknown how to continue from here. Antonio,
> > please
> > provide a statement what we should do with the patches.
>
>
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:56:25AM +0100, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> It is therefore currently unknown how to continue from here. Antonio, please
> provide a statement what we should do with the patches.
There were two issues here:
1) the code was not really following the kernel style and I
From: Andreas Pape
If dat is enabled it must be made sure that only the backbone gw which has
claimed the remote destination for the ARP request answers the ARP request
directly if the MAC address is known due to the local dat table. This
prevents multiple ARP replies