On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 08:11:29PM +0100, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Saturday 10 August 2013 12:01:02 Mihail Costea wrote:
> > Hi Antonio,
> >
> > Thanks for the update.
> > I will do the changes as soon as possible. I haven't sync in a while
> > with the code base, so I think the whole changes
On Saturday 10 August 2013 12:01:02 Mihail Costea wrote:
> Hi Antonio,
>
> Thanks for the update.
> I will do the changes as soon as possible. I haven't sync in a while
> with the code base, so I think the whole changes might take a while to
> implement (+ I'm also working full time and trying to
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 07:33:41AM +0300, Mihail Costea wrote:
this is normal when you have multiple patches: if a fix in the very first
patch
of a series creates conflicts with all the following ones, you have to
adjust
them all (this is what the git rebase helps you with).
I
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 07:35:34AM +0300, Mihail Costea wrote:
On 9 September 2013 17:53, Antonio Quartulli anto...@meshcoding.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 05:05:47PM +0300, Mihail Costea wrote:
Hi Antonio,
Is it possible to send the new model for the generalization as a patch
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:45:44PM +0300, Mihail Costea wrote:
On 10 September 2013 08:38, Antonio Quartulli anto...@meshcoding.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 07:35:34AM +0300, Mihail Costea wrote:
On 9 September 2013 17:53, Antonio Quartulli anto...@meshcoding.com
wrote:
On Mon,
On 11 September 2013 00:01, Antonio Quartulli anto...@meshcoding.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:45:44PM +0300, Mihail Costea wrote:
On 10 September 2013 08:38, Antonio Quartulli anto...@meshcoding.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 07:35:34AM +0300, Mihail Costea wrote:
On 9 September
Hi Antonio,
Is it possible to send the new model for the generalization as a patch
first (the part without IPv6), or maybe everything as a patch as once?
Having 5-6 patches to rewrite every time something changes makes the
development harder.
Thanks,
Mihail
On 10 August 2013 23:36, Antonio
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 05:05:47PM +0300, Mihail Costea wrote:
Hi Antonio,
Is it possible to send the new model for the generalization as a patch
first (the part without IPv6), or maybe everything as a patch as once?
Having 5-6 patches to rewrite every time something changes makes the
Hi Mihail,
sorry for the very looong delay :)
I'm finally sitting at my new location and I can give you some feedback on your
nice work.
Comments are inline.
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 03:12:40AM +0300, mihail.costea2...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Mihail Costea mihail.coste...@gmail.com
Mades DAT
Hi Antonio,
Thanks for the update.
I will do the changes as soon as possible. I haven't sync in a while
with the code base, so I think the whole changes might take a while to
implement (+ I'm also working full time and trying to finish the paper
for my Diploma Project).
I hope that in 2 weeks I
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 03:12:40AM +0300, mihail.costea2...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Mihail Costea mihail.coste...@gmail.com
Hi Mihail,
sorry for the very long delay but I'm currently out of my office, so I'm not
spending a lot of time on batman-adv.
Anyway, I'll try to review your patches as
From: Mihail Costea mihail.coste...@gmail.com
Mades DAT support more types by making its data a void*, adding type field
to dat_entry and adding data_type to necessary functions.
This change is needed in order to make DAT support any type of data, like IPv6
too.
Adds generic function for
12 matches
Mail list logo
