Hello Andre,
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 04:46:44 -0500, Andre Courchesne wrote:
Ok, did a bit of tcpdump and my test was the following:
[cut]
Thank you for reporting this issue and sending us the dumps.
Actually it is very hard to link the ap isolation mechanism to this problem.
First of
Hi Antonio,
Thanks for the reply. I will attempt these tests today and provide you as
much feedback as possible.
We are using loop avoidance because in some (if not all) installations we
will be doing there will be multiple AP wired to the same network to provide
redundancy. And if we
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:30:05AM -0500, Andre Courchesne wrote:
Hi Antonio,
Thanks for the reply. I will attempt these tests today and provide you as
much feedback as possible.
Thank you.
We are using loop avoidance because in some (if not all) installations we
will be doing
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de
---
soft-interface.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/soft-interface.c b/soft-interface.c
index 2ffdc74..7548762 100644
--- a/soft-interface.c
+++ b/soft-interface.c
@@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ struct net_device
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:11:55PM +0800, Marek Lindner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de
---
soft-interface.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/soft-interface.c b/soft-interface.c
index 2ffdc74..7548762 100644
---
Hi Andrew,
Do you have any performance analysis to show this is really helpful
and not harmful?
I've seen indoor results where i had to reduce the hop penalty,
otherwise BATMAN was taking a short path which worked badly. By
reducing the hop penalty, so encouraging it to take more hops, i
Hi all,
2012/1/27 Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de:
Hi Andrew,
Do you have any performance analysis to show this is really helpful
and not harmful?
I've seen indoor results where i had to reduce the hop penalty,
otherwise BATMAN was taking a short path which worked badly. By
reducing
So, you had to reduce the default value of 10 to something even smaller ? A
hop penalty of 10 results in a penatly of 4% per hop. A rough equivalent of 2
lost packets (62/64). Does not sound very much to me. Can you explain your
test setup a little more ?
These observations come from a