Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] ap_isolation issue

2012-01-27 Thread Antonio Quartulli
Hello Andre, On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 04:46:44 -0500, Andre Courchesne wrote: Ok, did a bit of tcpdump and my test was the following: [cut] Thank you for reporting this issue and sending us the dumps. Actually it is very hard to link the ap isolation mechanism to this problem. First of

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] ap_isolation issue

2012-01-27 Thread Andre Courchesne
Hi Antonio, Thanks for the reply. I will attempt these tests today and provide you as much feedback as possible. We are using loop avoidance because in some (if not all) installations we will be doing there will be multiple AP wired to the same network to provide redundancy. And if we

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] ap_isolation issue

2012-01-27 Thread Antonio Quartulli
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:30:05AM -0500, Andre Courchesne wrote: Hi Antonio, Thanks for the reply. I will attempt these tests today and provide you as much feedback as possible. Thank you. We are using loop avoidance because in some (if not all) installations we will be doing

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: encourage batman to take shorter routes by changing the default hop penalty

2012-01-27 Thread Marek Lindner
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de --- soft-interface.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/soft-interface.c b/soft-interface.c index 2ffdc74..7548762 100644 --- a/soft-interface.c +++ b/soft-interface.c @@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ struct net_device

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: encourage batman to take shorter routes by changing the default hop penalty

2012-01-27 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:11:55PM +0800, Marek Lindner wrote: Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de --- soft-interface.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/soft-interface.c b/soft-interface.c index 2ffdc74..7548762 100644 ---

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: encourage batman to take shorter routes by changing the default hop penalty

2012-01-27 Thread Marek Lindner
Hi Andrew, Do you have any performance analysis to show this is really helpful and not harmful? I've seen indoor results where i had to reduce the hop penalty, otherwise BATMAN was taking a short path which worked badly. By reducing the hop penalty, so encouraging it to take more hops, i

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: encourage batman to take shorter routes by changing the default hop penalty

2012-01-27 Thread Daniele Furlan
Hi all, 2012/1/27 Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de: Hi Andrew, Do you have any performance analysis to show this is really helpful and not harmful? I've seen indoor results where i had to reduce the hop penalty, otherwise BATMAN was taking a short path which worked badly. By reducing

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: encourage batman to take shorter routes by changing the default hop penalty

2012-01-27 Thread Andrew Lunn
So, you had to reduce the default value of 10 to something even smaller ? A hop penalty of 10 results in a penatly of 4% per hop. A rough equivalent of 2 lost packets (62/64). Does not sound very much to me. Can you explain your test setup a little more ? These observations come from a