Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] BATGAT

2008-09-10 Thread Gustavo Lindberg
Thanks for your answer. I am experimenting very frustrating issues with batgat. Currently i am testing the last trunk of kamikaze on ubiquity NS2. Batmand dies quietly with batgat loaded. I will prove the last kamikaze on two NS2 without batgat and inform the bug if this error happen again. Regard

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] BATGAT

2008-09-10 Thread Simon Wunderlich
Hello Gustavo, batman works fine without the batgat kernel module. The batgat kernel module will only accelerate the gateway functionality, but batman can do without it. If you don't want it, don't insmod batgat. Batman will detect it at runtime, no need to recompile. The gateway should still work

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] BATGAT

2008-09-10 Thread Gustavo Lindberg
Hi all ! How to disable batgat ? It necessary recompiling batmand or is enough to unload batgat module ? I do that and batmand load but the gw never more assign ip trough the tunnel iface TIA

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Batman gateway lock ups

2008-09-10 Thread Sven Eckelmann
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 00:45:07 Sven Eckelmann wrote: > [...] > /* v0 and v1 holds pointer to new allocated struct */ > /* a3 holds "zero" - like t0 */ > 9a8: sw s1,8(v0) /* store pointer to client_data in new data buffer */ > 9ac: lw v0,36(a3) /* v0 gets free_client_lis

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Batman gateway lock ups

2008-09-10 Thread Sven Eckelmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 09 September 2008 13:26:47 Simon Wunderlich wrote: > Hey Sven, > > thanks for you analysis!! > > [...] > > Mhm, as far as i looked into the issue, there are the following > points where free_client_list is accessed: > [...] > So it seems the