Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] BATMAN routing (via gate0)

2008-11-22 Thread Derek C
Hi Marek, Does this mean that the mesh nodes cannot ping all the other nodes? This is if there is no routing to allow the nodes talk to "far-away" nodes not within their own AdHoc single-hop network? thanks, Derek On Sat, November 22, 2008 4:35 pm, Marek Lindner wrote: > On Sunday 23 Novembe

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] BATMAN routing (via gate0)

2008-11-22 Thread Marek Lindner
On Sunday 23 November 2008 00:20:55 Derek C wrote: > I see that BATMAN makes a tunnel to the gateway and then routes traffic > via the 169.254 gate0 subnet > > Does this mean that all outgoing from the node should be NATed? or is it > possible for the upstream node(s) to ping the node via its true

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] BATMAN routing (via gate0)

2008-11-22 Thread Derek C
Hi [yet] again! Can someone detail how BATMAN routes? For example if I have nodes with IPs like: 5.255.0.1 5.255.0.2 5.255.0.3 etc I see that BATMAN makes a tunnel to the gateway and then routes traffic via the 169.254 gate0 subnet Does this mean that all outgoing from the

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] gateX interfaces

2008-11-22 Thread Derek C
Hi Marek, It was pure lazyness that I was using kill -9 :) Derek On Sat, November 22, 2008 3:44 pm, Marek Lindner wrote: > On Saturday 22 November 2008 22:27:45 Derek C wrote: > >> Currently I'm constantly killing batmand and starting it up again >> (different debugging levels, etc). >> >> >> So

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] gateX interfaces

2008-11-22 Thread Marek Lindner
On Saturday 22 November 2008 22:27:45 Derek C wrote: > Currently I'm constantly killing batmand and starting it up again > (different debugging levels, etc). > > Sometimes I end up with a 2nd gate tunnel (so I'd have a gate0 and a > gate1). > > I understand (guess?) that it's because I do kill -9 a

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] gateX interfaces

2008-11-22 Thread Simon Wunderlich
Hey, On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 02:27:45PM -, Derek C wrote: > Hi, > > Currently I'm constantly killing batmand and starting it up again > (different debugging levels, etc). > > Sometimes I end up with a 2nd gate tunnel (so I'd have a gate0 and a gate1). > > I understand (guess?) that it's bec

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] gateX interfaces

2008-11-22 Thread Derek C
Hi, Currently I'm constantly killing batmand and starting it up again (different debugging levels, etc). Sometimes I end up with a 2nd gate tunnel (so I'd have a gate0 and a gate1). I understand (guess?) that it's because I do kill -9 and don't give batmand a chance to clean up. Normally is it