On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 06:11:53 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
The blaII code removed references to two functions outside of the own
source file. route_unicast_packet can be marked as static since
9c11509d3bbf914060be1bcb4448ea69d571fcb9 and tt_global_del since
Hi folks,
after having the B.A.T.M.A.N. IV routing code moved into one single file, a
preliminary routing protocol API and an easy to use routing protocol switch it
is time to move forward with B.A.T.M.A.N. V.
B.A.T.M.A.N. V is going to split the various tasks handled by the B.A.T.M.A.N.
IV
Signed-of-by: Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de
---
hard-interface.c |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hard-interface.c b/hard-interface.c
index 612f2c8..e16c996 100644
--- a/hard-interface.c
+++ b/hard-interface.c
@@ -337,7 +337,6 @@ int
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de
---
bat_iv_ogm.c |7 +++
hard-interface.c |3 +--
main.c |1 +
types.h |2 ++
4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bat_iv_ogm.c b/bat_iv_ogm.c
index 4ac2d1d..98c41f5 100644
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de
---
bat_iv_ogm.c | 11 ++-
hard-interface.c | 14 ++
types.h |2 +-
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bat_iv_ogm.c b/bat_iv_ogm.c
index 98c41f5..d944a0b 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de
---
bat_iv_ogm.c |4 ++--
hard-interface.c |2 +-
main.c |2 +-
types.h |4 ++--
4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bat_iv_ogm.c b/bat_iv_ogm.c
index d944a0b..b82a772 100644
---
Using BATMAN_OGM_LEN leaves one with the impression that this is
the full packet size which is not the case. Therefore the variable
is renamed.
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de
---
bat_iv_ogm.c | 12 ++--
packet.h |2 +-
routing.c|2 +-
send.c |
The coming protocol changes also will have a part called OGM. That
makes it necessary to introduce a distinction in the code base.
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de
---
bat_iv_ogm.c |4 ++--
hard-interface.c |2 +-
packet.h |4 ++--
3 files changed, 5
On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 17:33:14 Martin Hundebøll wrote:
On 2012-02-07 10:20, Marek Lindner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindnerlindner_ma...@yahoo.de
---
bat_iv_ogm.c |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bat_iv_ogm.c b/bat_iv_ogm.c
On 2012-02-07 12:10, Marek Lindner wrote:
+ unsigned long random_seqno;
+
+ /* randomize initial seqno to avoid collision */
+ get_random_bytes(random_seqno, sizeof(unsigned long));
+ atomic_set(hard_iface-seqno, (uint32_t)random_seqno);
Wouldn't it be better to
On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 19:13:27 Martin Hundebøll wrote:
On 2012-02-07 12:10, Marek Lindner wrote:
+ unsigned long random_seqno;
+
+ /* randomize initial seqno to avoid collision */
+ get_random_bytes(random_seqno, sizeof(unsigned long));
+
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 05:20:46PM +0800, Marek Lindner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de
---
bat_iv_ogm.c |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bat_iv_ogm.c b/bat_iv_ogm.c
index 3eff7f0..4ac2d1d 100644
--- a/bat_iv_ogm.c
On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 20:12:00 Andrew Lunn wrote:
Does this sequence number have any security relevance? Does it make
sense to use the TCP sequence number generation code?
There is no security relevance I know of. The idea was simply to start with
random number. Random is a bit better
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 08:21:55PM +0800, Marek Lindner wrote:
On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 20:12:00 Andrew Lunn wrote:
Does this sequence number have any security relevance? Does it make
sense to use the TCP sequence number generation code?
There is no security relevance I know of. The
Signed-off-by: Simon Wunderlich s...@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de
---
debug.c |6 +++---
debug.h |4 ++--
main.c | 50 --
man/batctl.8 |7 +--
sys.c| 12
sys.h|2 ++
6 files changed, 52
15 matches
Mail list logo
