I agree, whats the purpose of NOT having this information?
Henning
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 17:20, Mitar mi...@tnode.com wrote:
Hi!
(In a pure mesh protocol, routers with multiple interfaces should
probably appear as multiple nodes;
Why? I think it is good that the routing protocol knows
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 05:37:00 -0800, Mitar wrote:
Hi!
Maybe you could perform some more tests in this direction at the next
WBM in Athens?
I don't think any of us are going to Athens.
No? How come? Why?
I'm wondering the same :(:(:(
From the participant list it seems that all
Hmm, are we getting off-topic for the Battlemesh list?
(In a pure mesh protocol, routers with multiple interfaces should
probably appear as multiple nodes;
Why? I think it is good that the routing protocol knows that something
(some interfaces) belongs together (node).
I agree with both of
I don't think any of us are going to Athens.
No? How come? Why?
Gabriel and I are busy -- we're hard at work wrapping up some stuff
we've been working on for the last four years, we hope to finish soon.
I cannot speak for the others.
There Ain't No Cabal, if that's what you mean. However, in
Hi!
However, in my personal case, there's also the fact that WBM has been
evolving in a direction that I don't feel comfortable with (less
technical content, more self- promotion, tolerance for bomb-makers,
etc.)
Self-promotion of good ideas is not necessary bad. And others are there
to
Hi!
Perhaps the BATMAN developers have thought long and hard about giving
up the purity of a mesh model, and decided that it's worth it.
Perhaps they haven't. It's difficult to say, since they're not
interested in communicating on technical issues.
So we have one topic for the round tables.
Hey there,
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 09:02:54AM -0700, Mitar wrote:
Hi!
However, in my personal case, there's also the fact that WBM has been
evolving in a direction that I don't feel comfortable with (less
technical content, more self- promotion, tolerance for bomb-makers,
etc.)
From: Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 06:44:47 +0800
here are a few late coming patches intended to be merged into net-next-2.6/3.4
if possible. This is nothing fancy: They make peace with the recently
introduced checkpatch changes. Let me know if there any
