Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] RFC: Migration to a new git server backend

2012-07-29 Thread Sven Eckelmann
On Sunday 22 July 2012 01:43:25 Sven Eckelmann wrote: 1. 1 repository per project use only one repo for each project (batman-adv, batctl, batmand, ...) and use branch namespaces for individual users: * master, next, maint for the main stuff * ordex/ (for example ordex/dat),

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] RFC: Migration to a new git server backend

2012-07-29 Thread Marek Lindner
On Sunday, July 29, 2012 19:49:28 Sven Eckelmann wrote: The branches were migrated to the main repositories batman-adv.git and batctl.git. Simon Wunderlich, Marek Lindner and I have full access to these repositories. Following users have full access to their own branch namespaces

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] RFC: Migration to a new git server backend

2012-07-29 Thread Antonio Quartulli
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 07:49:28PM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote: On Sunday 22 July 2012 01:43:25 Sven Eckelmann wrote: 1. 1 repository per project use only one repo for each project (batman-adv, batctl, batmand, ...) and use branch namespaces for individual users: * master, next,

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] RFC: Migration to a new git server backend

2012-07-25 Thread Simon Wunderlich
Hey, On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 01:43:25AM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote: Hi, maybe some of you have seen that I talked in the channel to Antonio whether we should migrate to a different solution to serve our git repositories. This is (in my opinion) a good idea because gitosis [1] (the

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] RFC: Migration to a new git server backend

2012-07-23 Thread Sven Eckelmann
Hi, I was just asked whether the repo urls will change. I can only say for sure that the administration URL url will be changed. But to the rest... On Sunday 22 July 2012 01:43:25 Sven Eckelmann wrote: Now the question is: Do we want to use this feature or not. We had following ideas: 1. 1