>> Hey Jaideep,
>>
>> as Sven mentioned correctly, using the WPA sequence numbers in
WPA_NONE should be ignored. Some drivers (like madwifi) have to be
teached to >> do that. Sequence numbers do not make much sense in Ad-Hoc
anyway, as there is no central management for these sequence numbers. Of
Hey Jaideep,
as Sven mentioned correctly, using the WPA sequence numbers in WPA_NONE
should be ignored. Some drivers (like madwifi) have to be teached to do
that. Sequence numbers do not make much sense in Ad-Hoc anyway, as there
is no central management for these sequence numbers. Of course, you
LAMBA Jaideep wrote:
> I tried WPA_NONE and CCMP with wpa_supplicant on both the sides with
> preshared keys. By doing this you are right nobody can see the data and
> I get encryption and authentication. But here comes a twist.
> Lets say I power off one node completely after initial secure sessio
Sven,
I tried WPA_NONE and CCMP with wpa_supplicant on both the sides with
preshared keys. By doing this you are right nobody can see the data and
I get encryption and authentication. But here comes a twist.
Lets say I power off one node completely after initial secure session.
When he comes up wp
LAMBA Jaideep wrote:
> Are there any solutions currently under implementation for providing
> security (other than open/wep) over adhoc networks ?
What kind of security do you need? Security is a big field. Maybe you just
mean encryption and authentication.
When you only want to make the who
Are there any solutions currently under implementation for providing
security (other than open/wep) over adhoc networks ?
Thanks,
Jaideep
