> yeah, also fine with me. Although I don't understand why we have to
> change the licence of our file for that (I never wrote dissectors
> for tcpdump).
I'm directly using packet.h. As is, no changes. I need the packet
structure definitions. The file has a GPL header, so its licensed
under GPL. I
Hey,
> this is fine with me, let's hear what marek thinks.
yeah, also fine with me. Although I don't understand why we have to change the
licence of our file for that (I never wrote dissectors for tcpdump).
Regards,
Marek
> And I think that it is still a good idea to have tcpdump dissectors as you
> maybe want to have live output over your seriell interface on you embedded
> device without much hassle.
Yes, that is my aim. Wireshark has too much overhead for embedded
system use.
Writing the dissector was simple.
> Hello Andrew,
>
> this is fine with me, let's hear what marek thinks. BTW, there are
> excellent batman dissectors for wireshark, have you tried them already?
The B.A.T.M.A.N. dissector is in Wireshark 1.2, but the B.A.T.M.A.N. advanced
dissector is still waiting in
https://bugs.wireshark.org/b
Hello Andrew,
this is fine with me, let's hear what marek thinks. BTW, there are
excellent batman dissectors for wireshark, have you tried them already?
best regards,
Simon
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 08:36:44PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Hi Marek, Simon
>
> I'm writing a protocol dissect
Hi Marek, Simon
I'm writing a protocol dissector for tcpdump which understands
batman-adv packets. To do this i need to use packet.h, at least that
is the easiest way to do it. tcpdump uses the BSD license, where as
packet.h is GPL2. So it is unlikely the tcpdump maintainers would
accept packet.h
