On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> And there is currently no special batman-adv support for the flow
>> dissector [1] in the kernel. This could be also a reason why multiple flows
>> are not distributed well to different cores when you enable RPS/XPS. It is
>>
> And there is currently no special batman-adv support for the flow
> dissector [1] in the kernel. This could be also a reason why multiple flows
> are not distributed well to different cores when you enable RPS/XPS. It is
> not
> yet know whether this will actually be helpful but at least
On Mittwoch, 16. August 2017 09:39:00 CEST dan wrote:
> Anyone done any performance testing over wired links? ie, if two
> ethernet ports are gigabit and are added to bat0, what kind of
> throughput is expected across these interfaces and how much CPU is
> needed to get up near wire-speed?
I can
2 hops on full duplex links I'm getting 464Mbps. There is some loss
at each hop and I'm not sure why. Could be virtualbox and resource
contension that isn't showing up in task manager and/or top on the
vm's.
is this to be expected?
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 12:25 PM, dan
I'm only able to test in virtualbox at the moment.
I have a 3.1Ghz i5 and I'm able to do iperf across a batman-adv
network (nodes A-B-C with A and C not directly connected).
iperf between a<>b is ~1Gbps, A<>C is ~560Mbps and B has 1 core hit
100% by ksoftirqd.
So it looks like I'm stuck in a
Anyone done any performance testing over wired links? ie, if two
ethernet ports are gigabit and are added to bat0, what kind of
throughput is expected across these interfaces and how much CPU is
needed to get up near wire-speed?