Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: Add bonding functionality

2010-01-19 Thread Simon Wunderlich
Whoops, this is definitly a bug, thanks for pointing that out. Committed in r1552. On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 07:31:22PM +0800, Marek Lindner wrote: Hi, i've just committed this patch in revision 1551, as no further comments and critiques came in. I would consider this patch rather

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: Add bonding functionality

2010-01-19 Thread Marek Lindner
On Monday 18 January 2010 23:24:26 Andrew Lunn wrote: gw_node_update() is missing a rcu_read_unlock(); before the return inside the list_for_each_entry_rcu() loop. The others are less serious, but should be corrected as well. Thanks - I just fixed it. What does this error message want to tell

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Security on adhoc network

2010-01-19 Thread LAMBA Jaideep
Hey Jaideep, as Sven mentioned correctly, using the WPA sequence numbers in WPA_NONE should be ignored. Some drivers (like madwifi) have to be teached to do that. Sequence numbers do not make much sense in Ad-Hoc anyway, as there is no central management for these sequence numbers. Of course,

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv on different archs

2010-01-19 Thread Juha Ylönen
Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:38:32 +0800 Von: Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de Could you please let us know what part of the wiki does not work as expected ? Only then we can improve it. :) Ah yes, the instructions were actually were in the

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv on different archs

2010-01-19 Thread Juha Ylönen
Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:51:20 +0100 Von: Andrew Lunn and...@lunn.ch It would also be good to know the MAC addresses for the two laptops and the ARM board, so we know what messages are coming from where. On the laptop: HWaddr 00:22:fa:dc:9a:ce and

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv on different archs

2010-01-19 Thread Juha Ylönen
Original-Nachricht Datum: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:07:38 +0800 Von: Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de It confirmed what we saw in the other logs: This device (the laptop?) does not see the packets from the other side, therefore the protocol correctly assumes a dead

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv on different archs

2010-01-19 Thread Juha Ylönen
And a new try to send the log, previous was rather big and didn't get sent. This one is shorter and missing all the multicast traffic. -Juha -- Preisknaller: GMX DSL Flatrate für nur 16,99 Euro/mtl.! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02 ARM-batman-wireshark.log Description: Binary data

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv on different archs

2010-01-19 Thread Sven Eckelmann
Juha Ylönen wrote: I got the latest trunk up and running, some changes were required to get it to crosscompile for ARM (and 2.6.24 kernel). Same behaviour as before, device log shows a lot of activity, but laptop batman doesn't seem to be doing much anything. I tried the wireshark and got a

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv on different archs

2010-01-19 Thread Sven Eckelmann
Juha Ylönen wrote: As far as I can see only data from 00:22:fa:dc:9a:ce can be seen (send from us aka laptop?). Have you tested if the adhoc connection between this two devices (arm - laptop) is really working (just set up the adhoc network as usual and then give them an ip instead

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: Add bonding functionality

2010-01-19 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 08:12:49AM +0800, Marek Lindner wrote: On Monday 18 January 2010 23:24:26 Andrew Lunn wrote: gw_node_update() is missing a rcu_read_unlock(); before the return inside the list_for_each_entry_rcu() loop. The others are less serious, but should be corrected as well.

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv on different archs

2010-01-19 Thread Simon Wunderlich
Hello, just as a side note, would you mind sharing your changes which were required to cross compile for ARM? batman-adv is supposed to support 2.6.24, and if there is any trouble with this on ARM i'd like to add support for it. Thank you very much, Simon On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at