On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:31:03AM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 19. Oktober 2016 01:22:39 CEST Linus Lüssing wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:28:23PM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> > > Doesn't seem to scale. Especially when we think about batadv_netlink_ops
> > > which should
On Mittwoch, 19. Oktober 2016 01:22:39 CEST Linus Lüssing wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:28:23PM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> > Doesn't seem to scale. Especially when we think about batadv_netlink_ops
> > which should also be const. It is currently not const because of the
> > Linux <= 3.13
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:28:23PM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> Doesn't seem to scale. Especially when we think about batadv_netlink_ops
> which should also be const. It is currently not const because of the
> Linux <= 3.13 workaround.
Hm, okay, batadv_netlink_ops is a little more
On Dienstag, 18. Oktober 2016 23:21:25 CEST Linus Lüssing wrote:
> Substitutes the compat-patches approach for the netlink const changes to
> the prefered way of using compat-includes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Lüssing
> ---
> compat-include/net/genetlink.h | 15
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:21:25PM +0200, Linus Lüssing wrote:
> Substitutes the compat-patches approach for the netlink const changes to
> the prefered way of using compat-includes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Lüssing
> ---
Actually, it isn't a substitution yet, the