Re: [PATCH] b43-asm: Add 3 new virtual instructions.

2011-11-12 Thread Gábor Stefanik
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 9:12 PM, wrote: > On Nov 12, 2011, at 8:16 PM, Michael Büsch wrote: > >> On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:03:36 +0100 >> francesco.gring...@ing.unibs.it wrote: >> >>> On Nov 12, 2011, at 7:05 PM, Michael Büsch wrote: >>> On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:31:21 +0100 francesco.gring..

Re: [PATCH] b43-asm: Add 3 new virtual instructions.

2011-11-12 Thread francesco . gringoli
On Nov 12, 2011, at 8:16 PM, Michael Büsch wrote: > On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:03:36 +0100 > francesco.gring...@ing.unibs.it wrote: > >> On Nov 12, 2011, at 7:05 PM, Michael Büsch wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:31:21 +0100 >>> francesco.gring...@ing.unibs.it wrote: >>> orxh(r1 <<

Re: [PATCH] b43-asm: Add 3 new virtual instructions.

2011-11-12 Thread Michael Büsch
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:03:36 +0100 francesco.gring...@ing.unibs.it wrote: > On Nov 12, 2011, at 7:05 PM, Michael Büsch wrote: > > > On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:31:21 +0100 > > francesco.gring...@ing.unibs.it wrote: > > > >>orxh(r1 << 8) & 0x0100, r2 & ~0x0100, r2 > > > > This is not really g

Re: [PATCH] b43-asm: Add 3 new virtual instructions.

2011-11-12 Thread francesco . gringoli
On Nov 12, 2011, at 7:05 PM, Michael Büsch wrote: > On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:31:21 +0100 > francesco.gring...@ing.unibs.it wrote: > >> orxh(r1 << 8) & 0x0100, r2 & ~0x0100, r2 > > This is not really going to fly. If you want this highlevel stuff, you > should port a C compiler to the arch

Re: [PATCH] b43-asm: Add 3 new virtual instructions.

2011-11-12 Thread Michael Büsch
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:31:21 +0100 francesco.gring...@ing.unibs.it wrote: > orxh(r1 << 8) & 0x0100, r2 & ~0x0100, r2 This is not really going to fly. If you want this highlevel stuff, you should port a C compiler to the architecture. This is assembly. It doesn't know about reg