[Babel-users] ahcp prefix delegation

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, after reading a bit in http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/ahcp/draft-chroboczek-ahcp-00.txt i found "IPv6 Prefix Delegation" and "IPv4 Prefix Delegation". do i understand right, there will be a way to get ipv4 and ipv6 prefixes stateful from

Re: [Babel-users] [Olsr-users] [B.A.T.M.A.N.] A peer-reviewed assessment of OLSR, BATMAN and Babel

> I would have liked to see a comparison with OLSR.org default settings > (ETX metric) instead of hopcount metric. Agreed. Note however that this doesn't entirely explain why OLSR collapsed in their tests. If you look at table I, you'll notice that in the case of node Babel did choose the shorte

Re: [Babel-users] [Olsr-users] [B.A.T.M.A.N.] A peer-reviewed assessment of OLSR, BATMAN and Babel

I would have liked to see a comparison with OLSR.org default settings (ETX metric) instead of hopcount metric. As Henning already pointed out, hop count metric is not useful at all and was long abandoned. Nobody in our freifunk/funkfeuer networks actually uses hopcount and therefore we coul

Re: [Babel-users] Duplicating externals

> Please try this patch, running Babel with ``-A''. Er, slightly more complicated than that. You'll need to patch babel-pinger (see below) and run babeld -k 2048 -A 2048 The idea is that with -A, we use the kernel priority to choose between Babel and external routes. So babel-pinger needs to

[Babel-users] Duplicating externals (was: not routing)

Okay, I think that's the correct solution. Please try this patch, running Babel with ``-A''. Juliusz Sat Nov 7 18:44:25 CET 2009 Juliusz Chroboczek * Document -A. Sat Nov 7 18:43:25 CET 2009 Juliusz Chroboczek * Implement -A. diff -rN -u old-babe

Re: [Babel-users] not routing

> What if you used the logic to check only in the table babel was > started with (the -t arg)? For example, using -t 42, If a viable > route exists in table 42, don't create another default route, however, > if there is no default route in table 42, it is ok to add one. Looking at it some more, i

Re: [Babel-users] not routing

> I tested this hack below just now and it does not work. The route > still is only there when no other default route exists. Try this diff -rN -u old-babeld/route.c new-babeld/route.c --- old-babeld/route.c 2009-11-07 17:48:13.824763796 +0100 +++ new-babeld/route.c 2009-11-07 17:48:13.8407613

Re: [Babel-users] [Olsr-users] [B.A.T.M.A.N.] A peer-reviewed assessment of OLSR, BATMAN and Babel

>> 4. They ran the routing daemons with the default parameters. This means >>that BATMAN ran with an OGM interval of 1 second, while Babel used >>a Hello interval of 4 seconds. > Although I get your point, you probably share my belief in default options, > hence it is the right thing to

Re: [Babel-users] not routing

> What if you used the logic to check only in the table babel was > started with (the -t arg)? For example, using -t 42, If a viable > route exists in table 42, don't create another default route, however, > if there is no default route in table 42, it is ok to add one. Good idea. It's a little

Re: [Babel-users] [B.A.T.M.A.N.] A peer-reviewed assessment of OLSR, BATMAN and Babel

On Saturday 07 November 2009 03:05:31 Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > I've just come upon an interesting paper that experimentally compares > the performance of OLSR, BATMAN and Babel. > > Real-world Performance of Current Proactive Multi-hop Mesh > Protocols. M. Abolhasan, B. Hagelstein, J.

Re: [Babel-users] not routing

I tested this hack below just now and it does not work. The route still is only there when no other default route exists. Michael On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 20:15, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >> Except babeld on B is not inserting a default route to A until the >> adsl line on A goes away.  And it wi