Re: [Babel-users] babeld interface

> The main benefit of a well-known format is that the requirement for a > client goes from easy parsing code to *no* parsing code. Right. So either we add a dependency on JSON to babeld, or we add a trivial parser to every program that consumes babeld's input. > In this example, parsing the

Re: [Babel-users] babeld interface

> I agree that the current format is very easy to parse for a human, which > is a benefit. I am struggling to have a machine parse this though. You need a lexer. Here's a simple lexer for you: https://www.irif.fr/~jch/software/babel/babel-lexer.c -- Juliusz

[Babel-users] Branch unicast

Hi, I've pushed the code to run Babel over unicast. It's in branch "unicast". In order to use it, you need to say in your config file: default unicast true It's a per-interface parameter. The code is pretty nasty, and not up-to-date with master, so I'll probably be rebasing it some more.

Re: [Babel-users] Route-dete :wq

Christof Schulze writes: > There are approaches to reduce the amount of routes per client > including using nat66 on each node. You certainly are making it sound > like there should be put some thought into reducing the amount of > routes. This will be the next step

Re: [Babel-users] babeld interface

Juliusz Chroboczek writes: >> Nils and I wrote such a daemon, called mmfd. It is able to forward >> multicast packets in the whole network. To learn about the topology and >> the relevant neighbours, it queries babeld: mmfd is listening via >> "monitor" on the babeld socket. > >

Re: [Babel-users] List-ID

Christof Schulze writes: > Hi Guys, > > I am aware that you might already feel spammed by my mailing activity. > May I ask for the list admin to include a List-ID header in the mails of > this mailing list for easier filtering? From: Christof Schulze

[Babel-users] List-ID

Hi Guys, I am aware that you might already feel spammed by my mailing activity. May I ask for the list admin to include a List-ID header in the mails of this mailing list for easier filtering? Also with this header, many mail clients will recognize this mail as a mail to the mailing list

Re: [Babel-users] babeld interface

What do you think of providing the same data over json to make it better parsable? The format of the monitoring interface is well defined : it's a series of lines of the form keyword id key value key value ... where each key/value is either space separated, or a string within double quotes.