Re: [Babel-users] Route-dete :wq

>>> My thinking on this is that you only need the host routes when a client >>> actually roams. >> This is only going to work if you either use no hold time, or implement >> the optional algorithm in Section 3.1 of rfc6126bis. > I'm assuming you mean the ACKed retraction algorithm in Section

Re: [Babel-users] Route-dete :wq

Juliusz Chroboczek writes: >> My thinking on this is that you only need the host routes when a client >> actually roams. > > This is only going to work if you either use no hold time, or implement > the optional algorithm in Section 3.1 of rfc6126bis. I'm assuming you mean the