Re: [Babel-users] [babel] draft-boutier-babel-source-specific-02

2017-06-16 Thread Matthieu Boutier
> Does this mean whatever we decide for wildcard requests applies to > wildcard updates as well? That seems logical, but that's not what I propose. When a node requests a full dump, it requests only the routes it understand, not really a full dump. Sending a full dump may include unsolicited

Re: [Babel-users] [babel] draft-boutier-babel-source-specific-02

2017-06-15 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Juliusz Chroboczek writes: >> Does this mean whatever we decide for wildcard requests applies to >> wildcard updates as well? > > Yes, er, no, er, I have no idea. I do always enjoy your elucidating comments... ;) -Toke ___ Babel-users

Re: [Babel-users] [babel] draft-boutier-babel-source-specific-02

2017-06-15 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
> Does this mean whatever we decide for wildcard requests applies to > wildcard updates as well? Yes, er, no, er, I have no idea. -- Juliusz ___ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: [Babel-users] [babel] draft-boutier-babel-source-specific-02

2017-06-15 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Matthieu Boutier writes: > About wildcard updates: they're used to retracts all routes, typically > before a node stops. I don't see any use case of source-specific > wildcard updates (which would mean "retraction of source-specific > routes")... Does this mean whatever we