Re: [Babel-users] dropping CS6

2016-12-15 Thread Henning Rogge
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Henning Rogge wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Dave Taht wrote: >>> diffserv CS6 (I am the original author of the patch) has turned out to >>> be generally a lose on wifi, putting things into the VO qu

Re: [Babel-users] dropping CS6

2016-12-15 Thread Dave Taht
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Henning Rogge wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Dave Taht wrote: >> diffserv CS6 (I am the original author of the patch) has turned out to >> be generally a lose on wifi, putting things into the VO queue where >> they cannot be aggregated. I'd like to see

Re: [Babel-users] dropping CS6

2016-12-15 Thread Henning Rogge
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > diffserv CS6 (I am the original author of the patch) has turned out to > be generally a lose on wifi, putting things into the VO queue where > they cannot be aggregated. I'd like to see babel go back to best > effort. Do you have any numbers how

[Babel-users] dropping CS6

2016-12-12 Thread Dave Taht
diffserv CS6 (I am the original author of the patch) has turned out to be generally a lose on wifi, putting things into the VO queue where they cannot be aggregated. I'd like to see babel go back to best effort. ... I generally am running with ECN enabled instead, which has yielded interesting re