01.07.2014, 17:22, Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr:
Dear all,
In order to get the extension protocol published, I need to define
a policy for allocating TLV numbers. The reviewer has suggested
First-Come-First-Served with public reference, but is also willing to
accept
Specification Required today seems most workable for everybody in
foreseeable future, I finally understood it includes Designated Expert,
which I suggested in the past.
Sorry for not following up at that time, Denis, but we've got different
timings -- there's very little energy I can devote to
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek
j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr wrote:
I'm open to discussion, but I'm planning
0-127: Specification Required
128-144: Experimental Use
145-254: Specification Required
255: Reserved
What do you think about moving Experimental Use
I'm open to discussion, but I'm planning
0-127: Specification Required
128-144: Experimental Use
145-254: Specification Required
255: Reserved
The idea about the Experimental range is that it should be easy to decode
by sight in a hexdump. Hence the choice of values.
It would also be
4 matches
Mail list logo
