Re: [Babel-users] OT: experimental videoconferencing server

2020-04-12 Thread Harald Geyer

On 11.04.2020 12:30, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:

Hi,

In case anyone is looking for more secure alternatives to the 
commecial

videoconferencing offerings...

I've been doing my lectures over BigBlueButton.  I'm very happy with 
it --

it's rock solid, scales to 70 people with no problem, and the user
interface is well designed for lectures.  Our system engineers say 
that it

requires non-trivial server resources, though.

One of the interns I'm working with recommends Jitsi.  I have no 
personal

experience with it.


There is also sylk/sip2sip.info which is a frontend to janus and thus
quite resource efficient and not reinventing the wheel. Also the code 
is

hosted with darcs ... :-)

HTH,
Harald

___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users

Re: [Babel-users] OT: experimental videoconferencing server

2020-04-11 Thread Benjamin Henrion
On Saturday, April 11, 2020, Juliusz Chroboczek  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In case anyone is looking for more secure alternatives to the commecial
> videoconferencing offerings...
>
> I've been doing my lectures over BigBlueButton.  I'm very happy with it --
> it's rock solid, scales to 70 people with no problem, and the user
> interface is well designed for lectures.  Our system engineers say that it
> requires non-trivial server resources, though.
>
> One of the interns I'm working with recommends Jitsi.  I have no personal
> experience with it.
>
> For my own needs (chatting with my parents and drinking beer with my
> friends), I've written a very simple WebRTC-based videoconferencing server
> that requires virtually no server resources and is very easy to install.
> It builds a complete mesh between the participants in a group (which is
> why it requires little server resources), so don't expect it to scale
> beyond a handful of participants, but it works fine for small groups (the
> maximum we've done was six, including the cat, who of course had his own
> webcam).
>
> https://www.irif.fr/~jch/software/chat/
>
> (I know, I know, I should get my act together and release babeld 1.9.2
> rather than hacking WebRTC.)


Does not work with Firefox on iPad.

I wanted to pétition Apple for this. There are nasty restrictions for Apple
apps and WebRTC.


>
> -- Juliusz
>
> ___
> Babel-users mailing list
> Babel-users@alioth-lists.debian.net
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users



-- 
Benjamin Henrion (zoobab)
Email: zoobab at gmail.com
Mobile: +32-484-566109
Web: http://www.zoobab.com
FFII.org Brussels
"In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents
in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. Instead of
explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of software, they are now
seeking to create a central European patent court, which would establish
and enforce patentability rules in their favor, without any possibility of
correction by competing courts or democratically elected legislators."
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users

[Babel-users] OT: experimental videoconferencing server

2020-04-11 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
Hi,

In case anyone is looking for more secure alternatives to the commecial
videoconferencing offerings...

I've been doing my lectures over BigBlueButton.  I'm very happy with it --
it's rock solid, scales to 70 people with no problem, and the user
interface is well designed for lectures.  Our system engineers say that it
requires non-trivial server resources, though.

One of the interns I'm working with recommends Jitsi.  I have no personal
experience with it.

For my own needs (chatting with my parents and drinking beer with my
friends), I've written a very simple WebRTC-based videoconferencing server
that requires virtually no server resources and is very easy to install.
It builds a complete mesh between the participants in a group (which is
why it requires little server resources), so don't expect it to scale
beyond a handful of participants, but it works fine for small groups (the
maximum we've done was six, including the cat, who of course had his own
webcam).

https://www.irif.fr/~jch/software/chat/

(I know, I know, I should get my act together and release babeld 1.9.2
rather than hacking WebRTC.)

-- Juliusz

___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users