http://london.cloudcamp.com/
Bit of abuse of the camp word, but oh well.
Ian Forrester
This e-mail is: [x] private; [] ask first; [] bloggable
Senior Producer, BBC Backstage
Room 1044, BBC Manchester BH, Oxford Road, M60 1SJ
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
work: +44 (0)2080083965
mob: +44 (0)771191329
Very interesting - many thanks!
>
> Hans Hoffman has done some research in this area for the EBU:
> http://www.ebu.ch/en/technical/trev/trev_308-hdtv.pdf has some early
> qualitative opinions in, and there's a presentation of his more
recent,
> quantitative work at
> http://hdmasters2007.com/pdf/
The community broadcast is an interesting use. More equipment is accessible
now than ever before that makes it easy to make content for such channels.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Brian Butterworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 2008/7/11 Simon Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>
>>
>> At Mas
2008/7/11 Simon Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> At Mashed we ran an end-to-end DVB-T Broadcast chain which comprised:
>
>1. An SD encoder - taking just about any video file/encoding format
> 2. Metadata Generator
>3. Programme Scheduling
>4. Playout
>5. Multiplexing
>
> We'
Adam Hatia wrote:
Does anyone know of any study results or resources on perceived quality comparisons
between various resolutions (e.g. 1080i25 vs 720p50) & encodings?
Hans Hoffman has done some research in this area for the EBU:
http://www.ebu.ch/en/technical/trev/trev_308-hdtv.pdf has some
Does anyone know of any study results or resources on perceived quality
comparisons between various resolutions (e.g. 1080i25 vs 720p50) & encodings?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Jolly
Sent: 11 July 2008 12:49
To: backstage@lis
>
> Four, according to the OFCOM plan. It's based on a report by Zetacast
> which shows large improvements going to occur in MPEG4 coders and
> stat-muxing between now and 2020.
>
> http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/dttfuture/report.pdf
>
Actually it's three for now, with the fourth one muc
Simon Thompson wrote:
25fps, 1280x720, 16:9 (0.87 megapixels) is what is going to be in
"Freeview HD", the DVB-T2 service.
It's an option being considered.
oops - I misread that - 720p50 is an option in the Ofcom licence
conditions - not 720p25
--
-
Brian Butterworth wrote:
25fps, 1280x720, 16:9 (0.87 megapixels) is what is going to be in
"Freeview HD", the DVB-T2 service.
I'm not aware that anyone has ever suggested a 720p25 HD service in the
UK. Ofcom have proposed putting four *720p50* services into a DVB-T2
multiplex.
S
-
Sent via
At Mashed we ran an end-to-end DVB-T Broadcast chain which comprised:
1. An SD encoder - taking just about any video file/encoding format
2. Metadata Generator
3. Programme Scheduling
4. Playout
5. Multiplexing
We're dipping our toe in the water about Open-sourcing our efforts. We
Brian Butterworth wrote:
1080i25), or is the compression lower?
Yes. They are going to squeeze three HD channels into the 30Mb/s.
Four, according to the OFCOM plan. It's based on a report by Zetacast
which shows large improvements going to occur in MPEG4 coders and
stat-muxing betwe
2008/7/11 Adam Hatia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Inferior to Sky HD / Freesat / Virgin V+ then (broadcast at 1080i25), or
> is the compression lower?
>
Yes. They are going to squeeze three HD channels into the 30Mb/s.
>
>
>
> --
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
>
Inferior to Sky HD / Freesat / Virgin V+ then (broadcast at 1080i25), or
is the compression lower?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Butterworth
Sent: 11 July 2008 11:10
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage
>
> I guess 720p24 *is* technically a true, actual high definition standard,
> although I would be very sad to see it widely adopted... :-) (I think that
> for most *video* material, of actual moving subjects, you'd be better off
> picking a lower spatial resolution and a higher frame rate. Except
Adam Hatia wrote:
It claims to be true 1280x720 @24fps... http://vimeo.com/help/hd ...
The video in the link posted by Tom Hannen wasn't displayed at that
resolution, even when you clicked the "HD" toggle (which changed the
amount of lossy compression applied). Perhaps there's a different wa
15 matches
Mail list logo
