RE: [backstage] High Frame-Rate Television

> I wonder if highly shuttered video produces better results on > TVs that do motion compensated 100Hz stuff. E.g. if you > delivered them 25p but with the shutter open for 10ms rather > than 40ms, they will be able to make a much better job of the > motion compensation, producing something ver

RE: [backstage] Backstage Christmas Party(s), Sat 13th December 08

Of course not :) Ian Forrester This e-mail is: [x] private; [] ask first; [] bloggable Senior Producer, BBC Backstage Room 1044, BBC Manchester BH, Oxford Road, M60 1SJ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] work: +44 (0)2080083965 mob: +44 (0)7711913293 From:

Re: [backstage] High Frame-Rate Television

Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote: There was a cinema standard that called Showscan that ran at 60 instead of 24fps for similar reasons. And IMAX do a thing called IMAX HD that runs at 48fps. These systems both require a lot of lighting, and a lot of film stock to shoot, so I don't think they are likely

Re: [backstage] The "Page 284 of Teletext" test... anyone know the rationale?

Brian Butterworth wrote: This one, can't go around praising a document and not linking to it, terrible form... http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/pubs/whp/whp169.shtml Thank you for your kind words. :-) S - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backst