Another vote for mailman.
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:54:32 +0100, Ian Forrester
ian.forres...@bbc.co.uk wrote:
Hi all,
We're making some changes to the whole way backstage is setup and one of
those changes would affect this list directly.
MajorDomo is a pain and lacks the lovely new shiny
+1 for mailman
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Matt Hammond matt.hamm...@rd.bbc.co.ukwrote:
Another vote for mailman.
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:54:32 +0100, Ian Forrester ian.forres...@bbc.co.uk
wrote:
Hi all,
We're making some changes to the whole way backstage is setup and one of
On 20 Oct 2009, at 13:31, Andrew Bowden wrote:
In that case, I think it should be a web forum :)
Preferably requiring IE6 and an activeX component in order to function.
Normal service is now resumed ;-)
f
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
No, you can't use proprietary sotware!
Phew, now normal service is resumed. That was scary there for a while.
-Original Message-
From: owner-backst...@lists.bbc.co.uk
[mailto:owner-backst...@lists.bbc.co.uk] On Behalf Of Fearghas McKay
Sent: 20 October 2009 13:44
To:
Lets not forget to include a mandatory signup for an MSN Passport or
Google account or Yahoo ID ... even just to be able to browse ;-)
Matt
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:43:59 +0100, Fearghas McKay fm-li...@st-kilda.org
wrote:
On 20 Oct 2009, at 13:31, Andrew Bowden wrote:
In that case, I
Andrew Bowden wrote:
So it looks like mailman is the winner?
Has the backstage community ever almost unanimously agreed on
something before? It's nice for it to happen for once. :)
Err...
In that case, I think it should be a web forum :)
Microsoft *obviously* paid you to say that.
Matt Hammond wrote:
Lets not forget to include a mandatory signup for an MSN Passport or
Google account or Yahoo ID ... even just to be able to browse ;-)
I think we should move all of Backstage to Facebook!!!11
Everyone uses Facebook right!??!!?!1
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk
On 20-Oct-2009, at 15:11, Tim Dobson wrote:
Matt Hammond wrote:
Lets not forget to include a mandatory signup for an MSN Passport
or Google account or Yahoo ID ... even just to be able to browse ;-)
I think we should move all of Backstage to Facebook!!!11
Everyone uses Facebook
On 20-Oct-2009, at 15:26, Phil Lewis wrote:
[REDACTED]
I’m sorry, I would have replied to your message, but it required
quoting it, and I’m not sure I was granted the appropriate
redistribution rights.
M.
Produced for the BBC Backstage Mailing List by Mo McRoberts’ fingers.
© MM MMIX
Isn't there a flash-based forum somewhere that uses those open protocol
standards like rtmpe? That way we could embed H.264 video if we wanted
without fear of anyone pirating it. I would also suggest Huffman lookup
tables to prevent the message index being read by non-members. We must
always
On 20-Oct-2009, at 15:20, Tim Dobson wrote:
What do you think?
Good/Bad/Don't care?
Sensible.
http://nevali.net/post/218054190/back-of-envelope-analysis-bbc-trust-blocks-marquee
M.
--
mo mcroberts
http://nevali.net
iChat: mo.mcrobe...@me.com Jabber/GTalk: m...@ilaven.net Twitter:
I should have added that you are granted 7 days to view the message and
after which it will become unreadable. You also must always obtain an
auth token before reading (it only lasts 30 seconds) - unless of course
I choose to take my authorisation server down. I believe that this will
stop undue
You work for Twitter and I claim my five pounds.
Cheers,
Rich.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Phil Lewis backst...@linuxcentre.net wrote:
I should have added that you are granted 7 days to view the message and
after which it will become unreadable. You also must always obtain an
auth token
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/20/bbc_trust_rejects_iplayer_federation/
The BBC Trust has shelved a plan that would have allowed broadcasters
such as Channel 4, ITV and Five to share the Beeb's iPlayer.
The so-called Open iPlayer project was meant to establish a new
commercial service
What is so important about the content/metadata ingest and delivery system that
is the iPlayer that it needs to be licenced as opposed to being developed
in-house at a broadcaster?
--- On Tue, 20/10/09, David Tomlinson d.tomlin...@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
From: David Tomlinson
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 21:31, Kieran Kunhya kie...@kunhya.com wrote:
What is so important about the content/metadata ingest and delivery system
that is the iPlayer that it needs to be licenced as opposed to being
developed in-house at a broadcaster?
Possibly the fact that no other bugger is
16 matches
Mail list logo