Re: [backstage] BBC Archiver

2010-07-16 Thread Richard Jones
I like it, does what it says... So there's a +1 from me too. On 15/07/2010 20:32, Davy Mitchell daftspan...@gmail.com wrote: Glad someone likes it :-) People have being saying to me it looks unfinished, is cluttered, slow to navigate, 'pants', colours don't contrast well, 'pretty bad'.

Re: [backstage] Freeview HD Content Management

2010-07-16 Thread Mo McRoberts
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:07, Nick Reynolds-FMT nick.reyno...@bbc.co.uk wrote: In the case of Erik's post that you mention all we are actually doing is cross posting to it on the Internet blog. So the editor of the About The BBC blog has editorial responsibility for it because it was published

RE: [backstage] Freeview HD Content Management

2010-07-16 Thread Nick Reynolds-FMT
glossing over details which might not seem important but are What does or does not seem important is a matter of interpretation and is in the eye of the beholder... -Original Message- From: owner-backst...@lists.bbc.co.uk [mailto:owner-backst...@lists.bbc.co.uk] On Behalf Of Mo

Re: [backstage] Freeview HD Content Management

2010-07-16 Thread Mo McRoberts
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 19:27, Nick Reynolds-FMT nick.reyno...@bbc.co.uk wrote: glossing over details which might not seem important but are What does or does not seem important is a matter of interpretation and is in the eye of the beholder... Not really... What does this mean for consumers

RE: [backstage] Freeview HD Content Management

2010-07-16 Thread Christopher Woods
What does this mean for consumers in real terms? is pretty important -- that's why I wrote the guardian article (can't think of a better way to refer to that piece, sorry). The Grauniad recital =D I'll get my coat - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please